"Maybe" not all scalar implicatures are created equal

Stephen Politzer-Ahles

Abstract


Most previous neurolinguistic experiments on scalar implicature have focused on the <some,all> scale. We examined the processing of the <maybe,definitely> scale using EEG and MEG. Participants read the word "maybe" in correct contexts, semantically incorrect contexts (where only "definitely not" would have been true), and pragmatically infelicitous contexts (where "definitely" was true). Both violations elicited N400 effects, the effects differed in a late time window (suggesting that the brain was sensitive to different types of meaning, semantic and pragmatic). These findings do not replicate EEG findings on <some,all>, suggesting that different types of scalar inferences may be processed differently.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Chevallier, Coralie, Mathilde Bonnefond, Jean-Baptiste Van der Henst, & Ira Noveck. 2010. Using ERPs to capture inferential processes guided by prosodic cues. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 125-152. http://www.italian-journal-linguistics.com/wp-content/uploads/chevallier-et-al..pdf

Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector. 2012. Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In Maienborn, von Heusinger & Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 3, pp. 2297-2331, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Doran, Ryan, Rachel Baker, Yaron McNabb, Meredith Larson, & Gregory Ward. 2009. On the non-unified nature of scalar implicature: an empirical investigation. International Review of Pragmatics, 1, 211-248.

Doran, Ryan, Gregory Ward, Meredity Larson, Yaron McNabb, & Rachel Baker. (2012). A novel experimental paradigm for distinguishing between what is said and what is implicated. Language, 88, 124-154.

Geurts, Bart. 2010. Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, pp. 41-58, New York: Academic Press.

Horn, Laurence. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation.

Hunt, Lamar III, Stephen Politzer-Ahles, Linzi Gibson, Utako Minai, & Robert Fiorentino. 2013. Pragmatic inferences modulate N400 during sentence comprehension: Evidence from picture-sentence verification. Neuroscience Letters, 534, 246-251.

Nieuwland, Mante, Tali Ditman, & Gina Kuperberg. 2010. On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 324-346.

Noveck, Ira, & Andres Posada. 2003. Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language, 85, 203-210.

Panizza, Daniele, & Edgar Onea. 2014. Some implicatures take their time: an ERP study on scalar implicatures with 'sentence-picture vs. picture-sentence' verification task. Talk presented at 27th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Columbus, OH.

Politzer-Ahles, Stephen, Robert Fiorentino, Xiaoming Jiang, & Xiaolin Zhou. 2013. Distinct neural correlates for pragmatic and semantic meaning processing: An event-related potential investigation of scalar implicature processing using picture-sentence verification. Brain Research, 1490, 134-152.

Sikos, Les, Sam Tomlinson, Hilary Traut & Daniel Grodner. .2013. Incremental computation of scalar implicatures: An ERP study. Poster presented at 26th CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing. Columbia, SC.

Spychalska, Maria, Jarmo Kontinen, & Markus Werning. 2014. Electrophysiology of pragmatic processing: exploring the processing cost of the scalar implicature in the truth-value judgment task. In P. Bello et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1497-1502, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

van Tiel, Bob, Emiel van Miltenburg, Natalia Zevakhina, & Bart Geurts. 2014. Scalar diversity. Journal of Semantics. Advance access. http://jos.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/12/22/jos.ffu017.full




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/exabs.v0i0.2990