Nasalization as a Repair for Voiced Obstruent Codas in Noon

John Merrill

Abstract


The Senegalese language Noon exhibits a pattern by which the voiced stop phonemes /b, d, ɟ, g/ surface as nasals [m, n ɲ, ŋ] in coda position, undergoing complete neutralization with /m, n, ɲ, ŋ/. This allophonic alternation can be seen as a repair to the cross-linguistic constraint against voiced obstruents in coda position. However, the only otherwise attested repair to this marked structure is devoicing. Why should devoicing be so overwhelmingly preferred to other logical alternatives such as nasalization or gliding? Steriade (2008) answers this question with reference to her P-Map hypothesis, arguing that a [b~p] alternation is preferred because the perceptual distance between these sounds is less in this environment than between [b] and [m]; in essence, the synchronic system prefers a repair that changes a sound as little as possible, as determined by perceptual distinctness. The Noon facts are a clear counter-example to this prediction, and challenge any answer to the above question which requires synchronic systems to prefer the most “phonetically natural” repair.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Blumenfeld, Lev. 2006. Constraints on phonological interactions. Stanford University: Doctoral thesis.

D’Alton, Paula. 1983. Esquisse phonologique et morphologique du Palor, langue Cangin (Sénégal). Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle: Doctoral thesis.

Dieye, El Hadji. 2010. Description d'une langue Cangin du Sénégal: Le Laalaa. Dakar: Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar.

Hermans, Ben and Marc van Oostendorp. 2007. “Solving the Too-many-solutions-problem.” Talk presented at the Meertens Institute, June 4, 2007.

Lopis, Jeanne. 1981. Phonologie et morphologie nominale du noon, parler de Nguente. Université de la Sorbonne Nouvelle: Doctoral thesis.

Mbodj, Cherif. 1983. Recherche sur la phonologie et la morphologie de la langue saafi: le parler de Boukhou, Sénégal. Université de Nice: Doctoral thesis.

Morgan, Daniel Ray. 1996. Overview of Grammatical Structures of Ndut. UT Arlington: Master’s thesis.

Myers, Scott. 2012. “Final devoicing: Production and perception studies.” In T. Borowsky, S. Kawahara, T. Shinya, and M. Sugahara (eds.) Prosody Matters: Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, (pp. 151-179). London: Equinox Press, London.

Soukka, Maria. 2000. A Descriptive Grammar of Noon. Lincom Europa.

Stausland Johnsen, Sverre. 2012. “A diachronic account of phonological unnaturalness.” Phonology 29, (pp. 505-531).

Steriade, Donca. 2008. “The phonology of perceptibility effects.” In Hanson, K. and Inkelas, S. (eds.) The nature of the word, (pp. 151–179). Cambridge: MIT Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/exabs.v0i0.3014