Passivization possibilities in double-accusative constructions
Abstract
Based on a diachronic corpus search, this paper proposes that dative rather than accusative-marking on the first object of German double-accusative verbs like lehren 'teach' (as also discussed in Lang 2007) and the corresponding passivization possibilities stem from the first object being interpreted as Recipient (sympathy-invoking co-participant, see Lehmann et al. 2004) rather than animate Patient and the second object being interpreted as inanimate Patient rather than adverbial accusative. In addition, a formal case-based account of German active and passive (di)transitive constructions is offered, making a three-way distinction between (i) structural, (ii) predictable inherent, and (iii) idiosyncratic lexical case (in line with Woolford 2006).
Keywords
double-accusative verbs; passivization; dative case; kriegen/bekommen (‘get’) passive; diachronic corpus study; double-object construction; verbal argument structure; structural case; inherent case; lexical case
Full Text:
PDFDOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v2i0.4050
Copyright (c) 2017 Vera Lee-Schoenfeld, Gabriele Diewald

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Linguistic Society of America
Advancing the Scientific Study of Language since 1924
ISSN (online): 2473-8689
This publication is made available for free to readers and with no charge to authors thanks in part to your continuing LSA membership and your donations to the open access fund.