Differential objects and other structural objects

Monica Alexandrina Irimia


Several recent accounts take adpositional differential marking to indicate those classes of DPs that require obligatory licensing (Case). Here, we examine data from Gujarati and Romanian where this analysis is harder to implement.  The two languages exhibit structural DPs that are signaled via a preposition. But they also contain other structural objects which must be equally analyzed in terms of licensing, leaving the difference from the adpositional objects unexplained. The solution proposed builds on the idea of secondary licensing on the same DP, going back to Kayne’s Generalization. The conclusion is that, at least in some languages, differential objects are classes that undergo an additional licensing operation.


differential object marking, licensing, secondary licenser

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4345

Copyright (c) 2018 Monica Alexandrina Irimia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Donate to the Open-Access Fund of the LSA

Linguistic Society of America

Advancing the Scientific Study of Language

ISSN (online): 2473-8689

This publication is made available for free to readers and with no charge to authors thanks in part to your continuing LSA membership and your donations to the open access fund.