Conjunction and disjunction in a language without 'and'

Margit Bowler

Abstract


Warlpiri (Pama-Nyungan, Australia) has a single coordinator, manu. This coordinator occurs in constructions of the form P manu Q. In the following paper, I argue that manu has a non-strengthened disjunctive denotation which can undergo pragmatic strengthening to conjunction. I propose that the absence of a conjunctive coordinator in Warlpiri results in the set of scalar alternatives {P, Q, (P or Q)} for P manu Q. This is identical to the set of scalar alternatives for English P or Q proposed by Singh, et al. (2013) for English-speaking children. I follow Singh, et al. in using a recursive application of Fox's (2007) exhaustivity operator, Exh, to derive a strengthened conjunctive reading of P manu Q that is categorical in unembedded contexts. I also address strengthening under the scope of negation and in conditionals and Wh-questions, and place some pragmatic constraints on Exh application.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicature. In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (ed.), Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, 71–120. Palgrave Macmillan.

Fox, Danny & Roni Katzir. 2011. On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics 19(1). 87–107.

Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (ed.), Speech Acts, 41–58. Academic Press.

Guerzoni, Elena & Yael Sharvit. 2007. A question of strength: on NPIs in interroga- tive clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 30. 361–391.

Guerzoni, Elena & Yael Sharvit. 2013. Whether or anything but not whether anything or not. USC & UCLA, ms.

Katzir, Roni. 2008. Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30. 669–690.

Link, Godehard. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice-theoretical approach. In Bainer Bäuerle, et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, 302–323. De Gruyter.

Meyer, Marie-Christine. 2012. Generalized free choice and missing alternatives. MIT, ms.

Sauerland, Uli. 2004. Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 367–391.

Singh, Raj, Ken Wexler, Andrea Astle, Deepthi Kamawar, & Danny Fox. 2013. Children interpret disjunction as conjunction: consequences for the theory of scalar implicature. Carleton University, ms.

Szabolsci, Anna & Bill Haddican. 2004. Conjunction meets negation. Journal of Semantics 21. 219–249.

Von Fintel, Kai. 1999. NPI-licensing, Strawson-entailment, and context-dependency. Journal of Semantics 16(1).

Zimmermann, Thomas Ede. 2001. Free choice disjunction and epistemic possibility. Natural Language Semantics 8. 255–290.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2422