A superlative argument for a minimal theory of definiteness

Elizabeth Coppock, David Beaver

Abstract


This paper concerns the interpretation of the definite article with superlatives on a relative interpretation. Previous work has suggested that definite superlative noun phrases like the fewest letters in Gloria received the fewest letters (relative superlative DPs) are semantically indefinite. This paper argues that such DPs are definite (presupposing uniqueness) but not determinate (denoting an individual). We provide new evidence that they are not determinate, and undertake a critical review of the evidence that has previously been used to argue for their indefiniteness, arguing that it is consistent with the hypothesis that they are definite. We argue furthermore that a movement analysis of relative superlatives is not consistent with a treatment of the determiner as definite. We therefore offer an analysis of relative superlative DPs on which they are definite but indeterminate, and the superlative morpheme is interpreted in situ.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaver, David. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Beaver, David & Emiel Krahmer. 2001. A partial account of presupposition projec- tion. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10. 147–182.

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. MIT Press.

Bruyn, Bert Le, Henriëtte de Swart & Joost Zwarts. 2013. Have, with, and without. In Proceedings of SALT 23, 535–548. eLanguage.

Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2012. Weak uniqueness: The only difference between definites and indefinites. In Anca Chereches (ed.), Proceedings of SALT 22, eLanguage.

Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2014. Definiteness and determinacy. Semantics Archive. Http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/mViOGEzY/.

Davies, William & Stanley Dubinsky. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(1). 1–37.

Farkas, Donka & Katalin É. Kiss. 2000. On the comparative and absolute readings of superlatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18. 417–455.

Fiengo, Robert & James Higginbotham. 1981. Opacity in NP. Linguistic Analysis 7(4). 395–421.

Gawron, Jean Mark. 1995. Comparatives, superlatives, and resolution. Linguistics and Philosophy 18. 333–380.

Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier. 2006. Superlative quantifiers and the dynamics of context- dependence. In Klaus von Heusinger & Ken Turner (eds.), Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, 237–266. Oxford: Elsevier.

Hackl, Martin. 2001. Comparative quantifiers. Department of Linguistics Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Hackl, Martin. 2009. On the grammar and processing of proportional quantifiers: most vs. more than half. Natural Language Semantics 17. 63–98.

Haug, Dag. 2013. Partial dynamic semantics for anaphora: Compositionality without syntactic coindexation. Journal of Semantics (online first).

Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/zc0ZjY0M.

Heim, Irene. 1999. Notes on superlatives. Ms., MIT.

Herdan, Simona & Yael Sharvit. 2006. Definite and nondefinite superlatives and NPI licensing. Syntax 9(1). 1–31.

Krasikova, Sveta. 2012. Definiteness in superlatives. In Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit W. Sassoon, Katrin Schulz & Matthijs Westera (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning, vol. 7218/2012, 411–420. Dordrecht: Springer.

McNally, Louise. 1997. A Semantics for the English Existential Construction. Taylor & Francis.

Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3. 1–29.

Muskens, Reinhard. 1995. Meaning and Partiality. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Schwager, Magdalena. 2009. Speaking of qualities. In Proceedings of SALT, vol. 19, 395–412.

Seuren, Peter. 1973. The comparative. In Ferenc Kiefer & Nicolas Ruwet (eds.), Generative Grammar in Europe, 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.

Sharvit, Yael & Penka Stateva. 2002. Superlative expressions, context, and focus. Linguistics and Philosophy 25. 453–505.

Stateva, Penka. 2000. In defense of the movement theory of superlatives. In R. Daly & A. Riehl (eds.), Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference on Linguistics 1999, 215–226. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 1986. Comparative superlatives. In Naoki Fukui, Tova Rapoport & Elizabeth Sagey (eds.), Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 245–265. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2010. Quantification. Cambridge University Press.

Szabolcsi, Anna. 2012. Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most. In Proceedings of SALT 22, 1–25. eLanguage.

Teodorescu, Viorica Alexandra. 2009. Modification in the Noun Phrase: The syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of adjectives and superlatives: University of Texas at

Austin dissertation.

von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3. 1–77.

Ward, Gregory & Betty Birner. 1995. Definiteness and the English existential. Language 722–742.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2432