Amount semantics

Gregory Scontras

Abstract


This paper presents a case study of the English noun amount, a word that ostensibly relies on measurement in its semantics, yet stands apart from other quantizing nouns on the basis of its EXISTENTIAL interpretation. John ate the apples that Bill ate does not mean John and Bill ate the same apples, but rather that they each ate apples in the same quantity. Amount makes reference to abstract representations of measurement, that is, to degrees. Its EXISTENTIAL interpretation evidences the fact that degrees contain information about the objects that instantiate them. Outside the domain of nominal measurement, the noun kind exhibits behavior strikingly similar to that of amount; both yield an EXISTENTIAL interpretation (Carlson 1977b). This observation motivates re-conceiving of degrees as nominalized quantity-uniform properties – the same sort of entity as kinds. Thus, the semantic machinery handling kinds also handles degrees (e.g., Derived Kind Predication; Chierchia 1998): As nominalized properties, degrees are instantiated by objects that hold the corresponding property; when instantiated by real-world objects, degrees (and kinds) deliver the EXISTENTIAL interpretation.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Åfarli, T. 1994. A promotion analysis of restrictive relative clauses. Linguistic Review 11(1). 81–100.

Anderson, Curt & Marcin Morzycki. 2012. Degrees as kinds. MS, Michigan State University.

Carlson, Gregory. 1977a. Amount relatives. Language 53(3). 520–542.

Carlson, Gregory. 1977b. Reference to Kinds in English: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.

Cartwright, Helen Morris. 1970. Quantities. The Philosophical Review 79(1). 25–42.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405.

Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On Wh-movement. In Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.

Cresswell, Maxwell John. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Barbara H. Partee (ed.), Montague Grammar, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.

Dayal, Veneeta. 1992. The singular-plural distinction in Hindi generics. In Proceedings of SALT 2, vol. 40 OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 39–58.

van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Grosu, Alexander & Fred Landman. 1998. Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6. 125–170.

Heim, Irene. 1985. Notes on comparatives and related matters. Unpublished MS, University of Texas, Austin.

Heim, Irene. 1987. Where does the Definiteness Restriction apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In E Reuland & A ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (in)definiteness, 21–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kennedy, Christopher. 1999. Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. New York: Garland.

Milsark, Gary. 1974. Existential Sentences in English: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Montague, Richard. 1974. English as a formal language. In R H Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, 188–226. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Partee, Barbara. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6. 203–300.

Partee, Barbara H. 1987. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J Groenendijk, D de Jongh & M Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Represen- tation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.

Russell, Bertrand. 1938. The Principles of Mathematics. W.W. Norton 2nd edn.

Scontras, Gregory. 2014. The Semantics of Measurement: Harvard University dissertation.

Seuren, Pierter A M. 1973. The comparative. In F Kiefer & N Ruwet (eds.), Generative Grammar in Europe, Dordrecht: Reidel.

Sharvy, Richard. 1980. A more general theory of definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 89(4). 607–624.

von Stechow, Arnim. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3. 1–77.

Wellwood, Alexis. 2014. On the semantics of comparison across categories. MS, University of Maryland.

Zamparelli, Roberto. 1998. A theory of kinds, partitives and of /z possessives. In Artemis Alexiadou & Chris Wilder (eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, vol. 22 Linguistics Today, John Benjamins.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2410