Generalized focus intervention

Jess Law, Haoze Li

Abstract


In a recent article, Li & Law (to appear) argue that focus intervention is a manifestation of inappropriate quantificational domains of focus-sensitive operators, resulting from the interaction of focus alternatives and ordinary alternatives. Their theory predicts that expressions introducing ordinary alternatives should all be subject to focus intervention, just as interrogative wh-phrases do. This paper bears out the prediction with non-interrogative wh-phrases and disjunctive phrases.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aloni, Maria. 2003. Free choice in modal contexts. In Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 7, 25 – 37.

Alonso-Ovalle, Luis. 2006. Disjunction in alternative semantics: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.

Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for lf movement. Natural Language Semantics 4. 1–56.

Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects in alternative questions. Natural Language Semantics 14. 1–56.

Beck, Sigrid & Shin-Shook Kim. 2006. Intervention effects in alternative questions. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 9. 165–208.

Biezma, Maria & Kyle Rawlins. 2012. Responding to alternative and polar questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 35. 361–406.

Cable, Seth. 2010. The grammar of Q. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of WH-questions: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2001. A puzzle about indefinites. In Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds.), Semantic interfaces: reference, anaphora and aspect, 51–89. Stanford, California: CSLI.

Crain, Stephen. 2012. The Emergence of meaning. Cambridge University Press.

Dong, Hongyuan. 2009. Issues in the semantics of Mandarin questions: Cornell University dissertation.

Erlewine, Michael Y. to appear. Alternative questions through focus alternatives in Mandarin Chinese. In Proceedings of Chicago Linguistics Society 48.

Hamblin, Charles L. 1973. Questions in montague english. Foundations of Language 10. 41–53.

Han, Chung-hye & Maribel Romero. 2004a. Disjunction, focus, and scope. Linguistic Inquiry 35(2). 179–217.

Han, Chung-hye & Maribel Romero. 2004b. The syntax of Whether/Q...or questions: Ellipsis combined with movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory

(3). 527–564.

He, Chuansheng. 2011. Expansion and closure: towards a theory of wh-construals in Chinese: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University dissertation.

Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2003. Intonation and interface conditions: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Kotek, Hadas & Michael Y. Erlewine. to appear. Covert pied-piping in english multiple wh-questions. Linguistic Inquiry .

Kratzer, Angelika. 1991. The representation of focus. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 825–834. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from japanese. In Yokio Otsu (ed.), The Proceedings of the third Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, 1–25. Hituzi Syobo, Tokyo.

Larson, Richard K. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3. 217–264.

Li, Haoze & Jess Law. to appear. Focus intervention: a quantificational domain approach. In Leland Kusmer & Jyoti Iyer (eds.), North-Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 44, Amherst, MA: GLSA.

Liao, Hsiu-Chen. 2011. Alternatives and exhaustification: Non-interrogative uses of Chinese wh-words: Harvard University dissertation.

Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese: University of Massachusetts dissertation.

Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998. On existential polarity wh-phrases in Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7. 219–255.

Lin, Jo-Wang. 2004. Choice function and scope of existential polarity wh-phrases in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 451–491.

Partee, Barbara Hall & Mats Rooth. 1983. Generalized conjunction and type ambiguity. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, use and interpretation of language, 362–383. de Gruyter.

Rawlins, Kyle. 2008. (Un)conditionals: An investigation in the syntax and semantics of conditional structures: UCSC dissertation.

Rawlins, Kyle. 2013. (un)conditionals. Natural Language Semantics 40. 111–178.

Reinhart, Tanya. 2006. Interface Strategies. MIT Press.

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus: UMass dissertation.

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.

Shimoyama, Junko. 2006. Indeterminate phrase quantification in japanese. Natural Language Semantics 14. 139–173.

Simons, Mandy. 2005. Dividing things up: The semantics of or and the modal or interactions. Natural Language Semantics 13. 271–316.

von Stechow, Arnim. 1991. Focusing and background operators. InWerner Abraham (ed.), Discourse particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German, 37–81. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Trukenbrodt, Hubert. 2013. An analysis of prosodic f-effects in interrogatives: prosody, syntax and semantics. Lingua 124. 131–175.

Watanabe, Akira. 2002. Loss of overt wh-movement in old japanese. In David Lightfoot (ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change, 179 – 195. New York:

Oxford University Press.

Yatsushiro, Kazuko. 2009. The distribution of quantificational suffixes in Japanese. Natural Language Semantics 17. 141–173.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v24i0.2416