Superlative Modifiers as Modified Superlatives

Elizabeth Coppock


The superlative modifiers at least and at most are quite famous, but their cousins at best, at the latest, at the highest, etc., are less well-known. This paper is devoted to the entire family. New data is presented illustrating the productivity of the pattern, identifying a generalization delimiting it, and showing that the cousins, too, have the pragmatic effects that have attracted so much attention to at least and at most. To capture the productivity, I present a new decomposition of at least into recombinable parts. Most notable is the at-component (silent in some languages), which takes advantage of the comparison class argument of the superlative to produce the set of possibilities involved in the ignorance implicatures that superlative modifiers are known for. A side-effect is a new view on gradable predicates, accounting for uses like 88 degrees is too hot. 

Full Text:



Alexandropoulou, Stavroula. 2015. Testing the nature of variation effects with modified numerals. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 36–53. Georg- August-University.

Alexandropoulou, Stavroula, Jakub Dotlacil, Yaron McNabb & Rick Nouwen. 2015. Pragmatic inferences with numeral modifiers: Novel experimental data. In Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney & Carol Rose Little (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 25, 533–549. LSA and CLC Publications.

Aloni, Maria. 2002. Free choice in modal contexts. In Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, University of Konstanz.

Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark. 2008. Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Biezma, María. 2013. Only one at least: Refining the role of discourse in building alternatives. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 11–19. Penn Linguistics Club.

Blok, Dominique. 2015. Scope interactions between modals and modified numerals. In Thomas Brochhagen, Floris Roelofsen & Nadine Theiler (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 70–79. University of Amsterdam.

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Supple- tion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Büring, Daniel. 2007. More or less. Paper presented at the Chicago Linguistics

Society meeting, May 2007.

Büring, Daniel. 2008. The least at least can do. In Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds.), 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114–120. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Ciardelli, Ivano & Floris Roelofsen. 2015. Alternatives in Montague grammar. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 161–178. Göttingen: Georg-August- University.

Cohen, Ariel & Manfred Krifka. 2011. Superlative quantifiers as modifiers of meta-speech acts. In Barbara H. Partee, Michael Glanzberg & Jurgis Skilters (eds.), The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 6, 1–56. New Prairie Press.

Condoravdi, Cleo. 2014. Ignorance, indifference and individuation in free relatives with -ever. Talk presented at the University of Gothenburg, May 13, 2014.

Coppock, Elizabeth & Thomas Brochhagen. 2013. Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers. Semantics & Pragmatics 6(3). 1–57.

Cummins, Chris & Napoleon Katsos. 2010. Comparative and superlative quantifiers: Pragmatic effects of comparison type. Journal of Semantics 27. 271–305.

Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures.

In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, 71–120. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Geurts, Bart & Rick Nouwen. 2007. At least et al.: The semantics of scalar modifiers. Language 83. 533–559.

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Floris Roelofsen. 2009. Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Presented at the Workshop on Language, Commu- nication, and Rational Agency at Stanford, May 2009, available via

Hackl, Martin. 2001. Comparative quantifiers. Department of Linguistics Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Hamblin, C. L. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10. 41–53.

Heim, Irene. 1999. Notes on superlatives. Ms., MIT.

Heim, Irene. 2006. Little. In M. Gibson & J. Howell (eds.), Proceedings of SALT XVI, 35–58. Cornell University.

Heim, Irene. 2008. Decomposing antonyms? In Atle Gronn (ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, 212–225. Oslo: University of Oslo.

Kennedy, Christopher. 2014. A de-Fregean semantics (and neo-Gricean pragmatics) for modified and unmodified numerals. Semantics & Pragmatics .

Kennedy, Christopher. 2015. A “de-Fregean” semantics (and neo-Gricean prag- matics) for modified and unmodified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 8.1–44.

Kratzer, Angelika & J. Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.

Krifka, Manfred. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, 257–

Oxford: Elsevier.

Krifka, Manfred. 2007. More on the difference between more than two and at least three. Talk presented at UCSC.

Mayr, Clemens. 2013. Downward monotonicity in questions. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, 345–362.

McNabb, Yaron & Doris Penka. 2014. The processing cost of interpreting superlative modifiers and modals. In Judith Degen, Michael Franke & Noah Goodman (eds.),

Proceedings of Formal & Experimental Pragmatics 2014, 29–35.

Mendia, Jon Ander. to appear. Focusing at least some determiners. To appear in Proceedings of CLS 52.

Nakanishi, Kimiko & Hotze Rullmann. 2009. Epistemic and concessive interpretation of at least. Slides for a paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian

Linguistics Association, Carleton University.

Nouwen, Rick. 2010. Two kinds of modified numerals. Semantics & Pragmatics 3. 1–41.

Nouwen, Rick. 2013. Modified numerals: The epistemic effect. Ms., Univeristy of Utrecht.

Penka, Doris. 2010. A superlative analysis of superlative scalar modifiers. Handout from Sinn und Bedeutung 15.

Penka, Doris. 2014. ‘at most’ at last. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 463–480. Georg-August-University.

Rett, Jessica. 2014. Measure phrase equatives and modified numerals. Journal of Semantics 32(3). 425–475.

Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions: University of Massachussetts at Amherst PhD dissertation.

Schwarz, Berhard. 2013. At least and quantity implicature: Choices and consequences. In Maria Aloni, Michael Franke & Floris Roelofsen (eds.), Proceedings

of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, 187–194.

Schwarz, Berhard. 2016. Consistency preservation in quantity implicature: the case of at least. Semantics & Pragmatics 9. 1–47.

Schwarz, Bernhard. to appear. At least and ignorance: a reply to Coppock & Brochhagen (2013). Semantics and Pragmatics .

Solt, Stephanie. 2011. How many most’s? In Ingo Reich, Eva Horsch & Dennis Pauly (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 15, 565–580. Saarland Unversity


Szabolcsi, Anna. 2012. Compositionality without word boundaries: (the) more and (the) most. In Anca Chereches, Neil Ashton & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings

of SALT 22, 1–25. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Wellwood, Alexis. 2014. Measuring predicates: University of Maryland PhD dissertation.

Westera, Matthijs & Adrian Brasoveanu. 2014. Ignorance in context: The interaction of modified numerals and QUDs. In Todd Snider, Sarah D’Antonio & Mia Weigand (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 24, 414–431. eLanguage.


Copyright (c) 2016 Elizabeth Coppock