Reasoning with Partial Orders: Restrictions on Ignorance Inferences of Superlative Modifiers

Jon Ander Mendia

Abstract


The present study is concerned with Ignorance Inferences associated with Superlative Modifiers (SMs) like at least and at most. Experimental evidence will be presented showing that the Ignorance Inferences associated with SMs depend on their associate: when the associate of an SM is a totally ordered set (e.g. a numeral), the exhaustive interpretation of the prejacent must necessarily constitute an epistemic possibility for the speaker. However, when the associate of the SM is partially ordered, the exhaustive interpretation of the prejacent can, but need not constitute an epistemic possibility for the speaker.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alonso-Ovalle, Luis & Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2010. Modal indefinites. Natural Language Semantics 18. 1–31.

Beaver, David I. & Brady Z. Clark. 2008. Sense and Sensitivity: how focus determines meaning. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Büring, Daniel. 2007. The least at least can do. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26, 114–130.

Cohen, Ariel & Mandred Krifka. 2014. Superlative quantifiers as modifiers of metaspeech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 37(1). 41–90.

Coppock, Elizabeth & David Beaver. 2011. Sole sisters. In Neil Ashton, Anca Chereches & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 21, 197–217.

Coppock, Elizabeth & Thomas Brochhagen. 2013a. Diagnosing truth, interactive sincerity, and depictive sincerity. In Todd Snider (ed.), Proceedings of SALT 23, 358–375.

Coppock, Elizabeth & Thomas Brochhagen. 2013b. Raising and resolving issues with scalar modifiers. Semantics and Pragmatics 6. 1–57.

Drummond, Alex. 2015. Ibexfarm (v. 0.3.7) [Software]. Available online at http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/.

Geurts, Bart & Rick Nouwen. 2007. At least et al.: the semantics of scalar modifiers. Language 83(3). 533–559.

Groenendijk, Jeroen & Floris Roelofsen. 2009. Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. Presented at the workshop on language, communication, and rational agency at Stanford. Available via www.illc.uva.nl/inquisitivesemantics.

Hintikka, Jaakko. 1962. Knowledge and Belief. Cornell University Press.

Krifka, Manfred. 1999. At least some determiners aren’t determiners. In K. Turner (ed.), The semantics/pragmatics interface from different points of view, Elsevier Science B.V.

Mayr, Clemens. 2013. Implicatures of modified numerals. In Carlo Caponigro, Ivan & Cecchetto (ed.), From grammar to meaning: the spontaneous logicality of language, 139–171. Cambridge University Press.

Mayr, Clemens & Marie-Christine Meyer. 2014. Two days at least. ROSE Project Workshop, Utrecht University (slides).

Mendia, Jon Ander. 2016. Focusing on scales: Superlatives as scalar modifiers. In Christopher Hammerly & Brandon Prickett (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 46, Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications, University of Massachusetts.

Nouwen, Rick. 2010. Two kinds of modified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 3(3). 1–41.

Nouwen, Rick. 2015. Modified numerals: the epistemic effect. In Luis Alonso- Ovalle & Paula Menéndez-Benito (eds.), Epistemic Indefinites, Oxford University Press.

Penka, Doris. 2015. At most at last. In Eva Csipak & Hedde Zeijlstra (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 463–480. Sinn und Bedeutung.

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus: University of Massachusetts, Amherst PhD dissertation.

Sauerland, Uli. 2004. Scalar implicatures in complex sentences. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(3). 367–391.

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2016. Consistency preservation in Quantity implicature: the case of at least. Semantics and Pragmatics 9. 1–47.

Westera, Matthijs & Adrian Brasoveanu. 2014. Ignorance in context. In Todd Snider, Sarah D’Antonio & Mia Weigand (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 24, 414–431.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3795