"Different" as a Restriction on Skolem Functions

David Lahm

Abstract


An analysis of different as in every child watched a different movie is developed that is based on an analysis of indefinites in terms of Skolemised choice functions. The internal reading of the sentence, which expresses that the movies covary with the children, is analysed as stating that the children can be mapped injectively to movies they watched. This is achieved by letting the Skolemised choice function that interprets the indefinite pick, for each child, an element from the set of movies that the same function does not assign to any other individual, which allows for analysing different in a manner parallelling ordinary intersective adjectives. Simply replacing this set of movies with the set of contextually salient movies then also gives the external reading. An implementation at the syntax-semantics interface is provided, employing Lexical Resource Semantics.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aloni, Maria. 2001. Quantification under Conceptual Covers. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.

Beck, Sigrid. 2000. The Semantics of ‘Different’: Comparison Operator and Relational Adjective. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(2). 101–139.

van Benthem, Johan. 1989. Polyadic quantifiers. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(4).

pp. 437–464.

Brasoveanu, Adrian. 2011. Sentence-Internal ‘Different’ as Quantifier-Internal Anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 34(2). 93–168.

Bumford, Dylan & Chris Barker. 2013. Association with Distributivity and the Prob-

lem of Multiple Antecedents for Singular ‘Different’. Linguistics and Philosophy

(5). 355–369.

Bäuerle, Rainer. 1983. Pragmatisch-semantische Aspekte der NP-Interpretation. In: Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachtypologie und Textlinguistik (Tübinger

Beiträge zur Linguistik 215), 121–131. Tübingen: Narr.

Carlson, Greg N. 1987. ‘Same’ and ‘Different’: Some Consequences for Syntax and Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 10. 547–556.

Geurts, Bart. 2000. Indefinites and Choice Functions. Linguistic Inquiry 31(4).

–738.

Iordachioaia, Gianina & Frank Richter. 2015. Negative Concord with Polyadic Quantifiers.

Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(2). 607–658.

Keenan, Edward L. 1992. Beyond the Frege Boundary. Linguistics and Philosophy 15. 199–221.

King, Paul John. 1989. A Logical Formalism for Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: University of Manchester PhD dissertation.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites? In: Susan Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar (Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 70), 163–196. Springer Netherlands.

Levine, Robert, Frank Richter & Manfred Sailer. (in preparation). Formal Semantics: An Empirically Grounded Approach. Unpublished manuscript. Ohio State University and University of Frankfurt a.M.

Penn, Gerald & Frank Richter. 2004. Lexical Resource Semantics: From Theory to Implementation. In Stefan Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG-2004 Conference, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 423–443. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier Scope: How Labor is Divided Between QR and Choice Functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20(4). 335–397.

Richter, Frank. 2004. A Mathematical Formalism for Linguistic Theories with an Application in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen Phil. dissertation (2000).

Sailer, Manfred. 2004. Propositional Relative Clauses in German. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, 223–243.

Schäfer, Roland. 2015. Processing and querying large web corpora with the COW14 architecture. In Piotr Bański, Hanno Biber, Evelyn Breiteneder, Marc Kupietz, Harald Lüngen & Andreas Witt (eds.), Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora (CMLC-3), 28–34. http://rolandschaefer.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/RolandSchaefer_COW14_CMLC3.pdf.

Szabó, Zoltán Gendler. 2010. Specific, yet Opaque. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager & Katrin Schulz (eds.), Logic, Language and Meaning (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6042), 32–41. Springer Berlin Heidel-

berg.

Winter, Yoad. 2001. Flexibility Principles in Boolean Semantics: The Interpretation of Coordination, Plurality, and Scope in Natural Language. (Current Studies in Linguistics 37). Cambridge, London: MIT Press 1st edn.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3793