Presupposition: What went wrong?

Lauri Karttunen

Abstract


When the first generation of generative linguists discovered presuppositions in the late 1960s and early 1970s, the initial set of examples was quite small. Aspectual verbs like stop were discussed already by Greek philosophers, proper names, Kepler, and definite descriptions, the present king of France, go back to Gottlob Frege and Bertrand Russell by the turn of the century.

Just in the span of a few years my generation of semanticists assembled a veritable zoo of ‘presupposition triggers’ under the assumption that they were all of the same species. Generations of students have learned about presuppositions from Stephen Levinson’s 1983 book on Pragmatics that contains a list of 13 types of presupposition triggers, an excerpt of an even longer unpublished list attributed to a certain Lauri Karttunen. My task in this presentation is to come clean and show why the items on Levinson’s list should not have been lumped together.

  • In retrospect it is strange that the early writings about presupposition by linguists and even by philosophers like Robert Stalnaker or Scott Soames do not make any reference to the rich palette of semantic relations they could have learned from Frege and later from Paul Grice. If we had known Frege’s concepts of Andeutung – Grice’s conventional implicature – and Nebengedanke, it would have been easy to see that there are types of author commitment that are neither entailments nor presuppositions. 

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbott, Barbara. 2006. Where have some of the presuppositions gone? In Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, 1–20. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Abusch, Dorit. 2012. Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presuppositions. In Brendan Jackson (ed.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 12, 1–19. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Anderson, Alan Ross. 1951. A note on subjunctive and counterfactual conditionals. Analysis 12. 35–38.

Baglini, Rebekah & Itamar Francez. 2016. The implications of managing. Journal of Semantics 33. 541–560. doi:10.1093/jos/ffv007.

Beaver, David. 2010. Have you noticed that you belly button lint colour is related to the colour of your clothing? In R. Bauerle, U. Reyle & T. E. Zimmermann (eds.), Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays offered to Hans Kamp, 65–99. Elsevier.

Beaver, David I. & Bart Geurts. 2014. Presupposition. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University winter 2014 edn.

Chiercia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and Grammar. An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Fillmore, Charles J. 1971. Verbs of judging. In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics, 272–289. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, C: 25–50. Sense and Reference. Translation by Max Black. The Philosophical Review 57:3, 209–230. 1948.

Frege, Gottlob. 1918. Der Gedanke. Eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 2. 58–77. The Thought: A Logical Inquiry. Translation by P. T. Geach. Mind 65. 289–311.

Frege, Gottlob. 1997. Letter to Husserl, 9 Dec. 1906. In Michael Beaney (ed.), Frege Reader, 305–307. Oxford: Blackwell. Translation by Michael Kaas.

Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Geis, Michael L. & Arnold M. Zwicky. 1971. On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry 2(4). 561–566. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177664.

Geurts, Bart. 1994. Presupposing. Osnabrück, Germany: Universität Osnabrück PhD dissertation.

Geurts, Bart. 1999. Presuppositions and Pronouns. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.

Goodfellow, Ian, Yoshua Bengio & Aaron Courville. 2016. Deep learning. Book in preparation for MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org.

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.

Heim, Irene. 1992. Presupposition projection and the semantics of attitude verbs. Journal of Semantics 9. 183–221.

Horn, Laurence R. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In The Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 98–107. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.

Horn, Laurence R. 1985. Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language 61(1). 121–174.

Horn, Laurence R. 2007. Towards a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung. In Istvan Kecskes & Laurence R. Horn (eds.), Explorations in Pragmatics. Linguistic, Cognitive and Intercultural Aspects, 39–69. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Kadmon, Nirit. 2001. Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Hoboken, Belgium: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kamp, Hans. 2001. The importance of presupposition. In Antje Roßdeutscher Christian Rohrer & Hans Kamp (eds.), Linguistic Form and its Computation, 207–254. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47. 340–358.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4(2). 169–193.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1(1). 181–194.

Karttunen, Lauri. 2012. Simple and phrasal implicatives. In *SEM 2012, 124–131. Montréal, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www. aclweb.org/anthology/S12-1020.

Karttunen, Lauri & Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Choon-Kyu Oh & David A. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11: Presupposition, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.

Karttunen, Lauri & Annie Zaenen. 2005. Veridicity. In Graham Katz, James Pustejovsky & Frank Schilder (eds.), Annotating, Extracting and Reasoning about Time and Events (Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05151), Dagstuhl, Germany: Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany. http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/314

Kiparsky, Paul & Carol Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph (eds.), Progress in Linguistics, 143–173. Hague: Mouton.

Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MacCartney, Bill. 2009. Natural language inference. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.

MacCartney, Bill & Christopher D. Manning. 2009. An extended model of natural logic. In The 8th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS-8, 140–156. Tilburg, Netherlands: University of Tilburg.

Morgan, Jerry L. 1969. On the treatment of presupposition in transformational grammar. In The Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 167–177. Chicago: University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics.

Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Putney, Mary Jo. 2010. One Perfect Rose. New York, NY: Kensington Publishing Corp. https://books.google.com/books?isbn=1420118129.

Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49.

Roberts, Craige. 2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5. 1–69. doi:10.3765/sp.5.6. Reprint of Roberts 1966.

van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9. 333–377. doi:10.1093/jos/9.4.333.

Schlenker, Philippe. 2007. Anti-dynamics: Presupposition projection without dynamic semantics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16. 325–356. doi:10.1007/s10849-006-9034-x.

Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Shakespeare, William. 1597. Henry IV, Part 2. Scene IV. London. The Boar’s-head Tavern in Eastcheap. http://shakespeare.mit.edu/2henryiv/2henryiv.2.4.html.

Simons, Mandy. 2001. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In B. Jackson R. Hastings & Z. Zvolensky (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 11, 431–448. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. doi:10.3765/salt.v11i0.3099.

Simons, Mandy, David Beaver, Craige Roberts & Judith Tonhauser. 2016. The best question: Explaining the projection behavior of factives. Discourse Processes 0. 1–20. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2016.1150660.

Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver & Craige Roberts. 2010. What projects and why. Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20 309–327. doi:10.3765/salt.v20i0.2584.

Soames, Scott. 1976. A critical examination of Frege’s theory of presupposition and contemporary alternatives. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology PhD dissertation.

Spenader, Jennifer. 2002. Presuppositions in spoken discourse. Stockholm, Sweden: University of Stockholm PhD dissertation.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton Munitz & Peter Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, 197–213. New York, NY: New York University Press.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Milton Munitz & Peter Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, 197–213. New York, NY: New York University Press.

Strawson, P. F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59. 320–344.

Valencia, Victor Sánches. 1991. Studies on natural logic and categorial grammar. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Universithy of Amsterdam PhD dissertation.

Wilson, Deirdre. 1975. Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. New York: Academic Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3954

Add comment