Focus association into copies and the scope of even

Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine

Abstract


Nakanishi 2012 presents a novel argument for the so-called “scope theory” of English VP-even, based on examples with antecedent-contained deletion (ACD). Nakanishi’s argument is based on the assumption that even cannot associate with a focus which has moved out of its scope. I show that this assumption is incorrect, defusing Nakanishi’s argument. I propose that when even associates with a focus which has moved out of its scope, it actually associates with focused material in the lower copies of movement (trace positions). I show that a closer look at ACD examples of Nakanishi’s type in fact forms a new argument against the scope theory. I conclude that English VP-even must always be interpreted in its pronounced position. The patterns of focus association with even presented here constitute a new argument for the copy theory of movement. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaver, David Ian & Emiel J. Krahmer. 2001. A partial account of presupposition projection. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10(2). 147–182.

Chemla, Emmanuel. 2009. Presuppositions of quantified sentences: experimental data. Natural Language Semantics 17(4). 299–340.

Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 20, 1–52. MIT Press.

Cooper, Robin. 1983. Quantification and syntactic theory. Dordrecht: Reidel. Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2014a. Explaining leftward focus association with even but not only. In Urtzi Etxeberria, Anamaria Fa ̆la ̆us ̧, Aritz Irurtzun & Bryan Leferman (eds.), Sinn und Bedeutung 18, 128–145.

Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2014b. Movement out of focus. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: PhD dissertation.

Fox, Danny. 2002. Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33(1). 63–96.

Fox, Danny & Jon Nissenbaum. 1999. Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR. In Sonya Bird, Andrew Carnie, Jason D. Haugen & Peter Norquest (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 18.

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25. 39–81.

Guerzoni, Elena. 2004. Even-NPIs in yes/no questions. Natural Language Semantics 12. 319–343.

Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Michael Barlow, Daniel P. Flickinger & Nancy Wiegand (eds.), West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 2, 114–125.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press. Karttunen, Lauri & Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Choon-Kyu Oh & David A. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 11: Presupposition, 1–56. Academic Press.

Kayne, Richard. 1998. Overt vs. covert movement. Syntax 1(2). 128–191. Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification. Linguistic Inquiry 4(28). 662–688.

Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language acquisition and the form of the grammar. University of Massachusetts Amherst: PhD dissertation.

May, Robert Carlen. 1985. Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. MIT Press. Nakanishi, Kimiko. 2012. The scope of even and quantifier raising. Natural Language Semantics 20(2). 115–136.

Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2.

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: PhD dissertation.

Rullmann, Hotze. 1997. Even, polarity, and scope. In Martha Gibson, Grace Wiebe & Gary Libben (eds.), Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics 4, 40–64. Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Rullmann, Hotze & Sigrid Beck. 1998. Reconstruction and the interpretation of which-phrases. In Graham Katz, Shin-Sook Kim & Heike Winhart (eds.), Reconstruction: Proceedings of the 1997 Tübingen workshop (Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 127), 223–256. Universities of Tübingen and Stuttgart.

Sag, Ivan Andrew. 1976. Deletion and logical form. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: PhD dissertation.

van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9. 333–377.

Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The meaning of chains. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: PhD dissertation.

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2005. Scalar additive particles in negative contexts. Natural Language Semantics 13. 125–168.

von Stechow, Arnim. 1991. Current issues in the theory of focus. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, 804–824. Walter de Gruyter.

Sudo, Yasutada. 2014. Presupposition projection in quantified sentences and cross-dimensional anaphora. Manuscript, University College London.

Wilkinson, Karina. 1996. The scope of even. Natural Language Semantics 4. 193–215.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3940