Number Neutrality and Anaphoric Update of Pseudo-Incorporated Nominals in Persian (and Weak Definites in English)

Manfred Krifka, Fereshteh Modarresi

Abstract


Persian shows differential object marking. We argue that objects without the object marker rā are pseudo-incorporated in the verbal predicate. Specifically, we argue for an existential closure operator over the vP that binds the event variable of the verbal predicate, and that nominals within the vP are interpreted as dependent definites with respect to the event. We show that this results in an apparent number neutrality of such nominals, and a maximality interpretation of anaphoric uptakes typical of E-type pronouns. The semantic contribution of nominals within and outside of the vP is modeled in DRT. We also argue that weak definites in English make use of the same strategy as pseudo-incorporated nominals in Persian, and offer an explanation why they are restricted to readings referring to institutionalized activities.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Joost Zwarts. 2010. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Nan Li & David Lutz (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, 1-15. Ithaca, NY: CLC.

Asher, Nicholas & Alex Lascarides. 2003. Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Asudeh, Ash & Line Mikkelsen. 2000. Incorporation in Danish: Implications for interfaces. In Ronnie Cann e.a. (eds), Grammatical interfaces in HPSG, 1-15. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Baker, Mark. 2014. Pseudo noun incorporation as covert noun incorporation: Linearization and crosslinguistic variation. Language and Linguistics 15: 5–46.

Borik, Olga & Berit Gehrke. 2015. An introduction of the syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation. In Olga Borik & Berit Gehrke (eds), The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation, 1-46. Leiden: Brill.

Browning, Maggie A. & Ezat Karimi. 1994. Scrambling to object positions in Persian. In: Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk, (eds), Studies on scrambling, 61-100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Carlson, Greg N. 2006. The meaningful bounds of incorporation. In Svetlana Vegeleer & Liliane Tasmowski, (eds), Non-definiteness and plurality, 35-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Carlson, Gregory & Rachel Sussman. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In Stephan Kepser & Marga Reis, (eds), Linguistic evidence, 26-30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Dabir-Moghaddam, Mohammad. 1992. On the (in)dependence of syntax and pragmatics: Evidence from the postposition -ra in Persian. In Dieter Stein (ed.), Cooperating with written texts, 546-573. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Dayal, Veneeta. 2011. Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29, 123-167.

Dayal, Veneeta. 2015. Incorporation: Morphosyntactic vs. semantic considerations. In Olga Borik & Berit Gehrke, (eds), The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation, 189-221. Leiden: Brill.

Diesing, Molly. 1992. Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 353-380.

Elbourne, Paul. 2005. Situations and Individuals. MIT Press.

Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 337-362.

Farkas, Donka F. & Henriette de Swart. 2003. The semantics of incorporation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Geurts, Bart. 2000. Buoyancy and strength. Journal of Semantics 17, 315-333.

Ghomeshi, Jila. 2003. Plural marking, indefiniteness and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 57, 47–74.

Hardt, Daniel. 2003. Plural pronouns with quantified antecedents. In Matthias Weisgerber (ed.), Proceeding of Sinn und Bedeutung, 149-158. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 114, Universität Konstanz.

Heim, Irene. 1990. E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 137–177.

Kamp, Hans & Uwe Reyle. 1993. From discourse to logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Kamp, Hans, Uwe Reyle & Josef Van Genabith. 2011. Discourse Representation Theory. In: Guenthner, Franz & Dov M. Gabbay, (eds), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 125-394. Berlin: Springer.

Karimi, Simin (2003). On object positions, specificity and scrambling in Persian. In Simim Karimi (ed.), Word order and scrambling, 91-124. Oxford: Blackwell.

Klein, Natalie, et al. 2013. Experimental investigations of weak definites and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition 128: 187-213.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide-scope indefinites? In: Susan Rothstein (ed), Events and grammar, 163-196. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. Focus and the interpretatin of generic sentences. In Greg N. Carlson & Francis J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, 238-264. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Krifka, Manfred. 2001. Non-novel indefinites in adverbial quantification. In Cleo Condoravdi & Gerard Renandel de Lavalette (eds.), Logical perspectives on language and information, 1-40. Stanford: CSLI Press, 1-40.

Massam, Diane. 2001. Pseudo Noun Incorporation in Niuean. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 153-197.

Massam, Diane. 2009. Noun incorporation: Essentials and extensions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 1076-1096.

Modarresi, Fereshteh. 2014. Bare nouns in Persian: Interpretation, grammar, and prosody. Doctoral dissertation. Humboldt Universität zu Berlin.

Modarresi, Fereshteh. 2015. Discourse properties of bare noun objects. In Olga Borik & Berit Gehrke, (eds), The syntax and semantics of pseudo-incorporation, 189-221. Leiden: Brill.

Neale, S. 1990. Descriptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nouwen, Rick. to appear. E-type pronouns: congressmen, sheep and paychecks. The Semantics Companion, Wiley.

Öztürk , Balkız. 2005. Case, referentiality and phrase structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Paul, Daniel. 2009. The individuating function of the Persian “indefinite suffix”. In Simim Karimi e.a. (eds), Aspects of Iranian linguistics, 309-328. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Poesio, Massimo. 1994. Weak definites. In Mandy Harvey & Lynn Santelmann (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 4, 282-299. Ithaca, N.Y.: CLC Publications.

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The generative lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier Scope: how labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335–397.

Schwarz, Florian. 2013. Two types of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistic Compass 7: 534-559.

Schwarz, Florian. 2014. How weak and how definite are weak indefinites? In Ana Aguilar-Guevara e.a. (eds), Weak referentiality. John Benjamins

van Geenhoven, Veerle. 1998. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions: Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. Stanford: CSLI Press.

Yanovich, Igor. 2008. Incorporated nominals as antecedents of anaphora, or How to save the thematic arguments theory. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 367-379.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3919

Add comment