On the status of 'Maximize Presupposition'

Sven Lauer

Abstract


Heim (1991) postulated the principle MAXIMIZE PRESUPPOSITION (MP), which has proven useful in the explanation of a range of phenomena But what kind of principle is MP? Is it a normative constraint on language use, akin to a rule in a game? Or is it similar to Grice's MAXIMS OF CONVERSATION, which capture defeasible tendencies in behavior motivated by general considerations about cooperative communication? I argue that either construal faces significant challenges, and provide an alternative conception of MP as a 'linguistic preference'—a (selfish) preference between linguistic forms that speakers happen to have. In this view, MP is neither a normative rule nor a Gricean maxim, but it functions like, and interacts with, such maxims in pragmatic reasoning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Paula Menéndez-Benito & Florian Schwarz. 2011. Maximize presupposition and two types of definite competitors. In North East Linguistic Society Conference (NELS) 39, 29–41.

Barker, Chris. 2005. Possessive weak definites. In Ji yung Kim, Yury Lander & Barbara Partee (eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax, GLSA Publications.

Bergen, Leon, Noah D. Goodman & Roger Levy. 2012. That’s what she (could have) said: How alternative utterances affect language use. In Naomi Miyake, David Peebles & Richard P. Cooper (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 120–125. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Blutner, R. 2000. Some aspects of optimality in natural language interpretation. Journal of Semantics 17(3). 189–216.

Chemla, Emmanuel. 2008. An epistemic step for anti-presuppositions. Journal of Semantics 25. 141–173.

Collins, James N. 2016. Reasoning about definiteness in a language without articles. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26, .

Degen, Judith & Michael Franke. 2012. Optimal reasoning about referential expres- sions. In Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Jonathan Ginzburg & Staffan Larsson (eds.), Proceedings of SeineDial, 2–11. Paris, France: Université Paris–Diderot (Paris 7), Paris Sorbonne-Cité.

Eckardt, Regine. 2007. Licensing ‘or’. In Sauerland Uli & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, 34–70. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Frank, M. C. & N. D. Goodman. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science 336(6084). 998.

Franke, Michael. 2009. Signal to act: Game theory and pragmatics: Universiteit van Amsterdam PhD dissertation.

Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Geurts, Bart. 2010. Quantity implicatures. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975[1967]. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts Syntax and Semantics, 41—58. Academic Press.

Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Horn, Laurence R. 1972. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English: University of California, Los Angeles PhD dissertation.

Horn, Laurence R. 1984. Towards a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Page numbers refer to the 2001 CSLI Publications reprint.

Horn, Laurence R. 2000. From if to iff: Conditional perfection as pragmatic strengthening. Journal of Pragmatics 32. 289 – 326.

Jäger, Gerhard. 2007. Game dynamics connects semantics and pragmatics. In Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen (ed.), Game Theory and Linguistic Meaning, 89–102. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier.

Lauer, Sven. 2013. Towards a dynamic pragmatics: Stanford University PhD dissertation.

Lauer, Sven. 2014. Mandatory implicatures in Gricean pragmatics. In N. D. Goodman, Michael Franke & Judith Degen (eds.), Proceedings of the Formal & Experimental Pragmatics Workshop, 21–28. Tübingen.

Leahy, Brian. 2014. On presuppositional implicature. Topoi 35(1). 83–91.

Lewis, David. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8(1). 339–359.

Mandelkern, Mathew Aaron. 2016. Dissatisfaction theory. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26, .

Percus, Orin. 2006. Antipresuppositions. In A. Ueyama (ed.), Theoretical and Empirical Studies of Reference and Anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empiral science. [Report of the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)], 52–73. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

Potts, Christopher, Daniel Lassiter, Roger Levy & Michael C. Frank. 2015. Embedded implicatures as pragmatic inferences under compositional lexical uncertainty. To appear in Journal of Semantics.

Potts, Christopher & Roger Levy. 2015. Negotiating lexical uncertainty and speaker expertise with disjunction. In Anna E. Jurgensen, Hannah Sande, Spencer Lamoureux, Kenny Baclawski & Alison Zerbe (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 417–445. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

Prince, Alan & Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Technical Report 2 Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.

Rawlins, Kyle. 2005. Possessive definites and the definite article. Ms., UCSC.

Rawlins, Kyle. 2006. Possessive antecedents to donkey pronouns. In WCCFL 25, . Sauerland, Uli. 2002. The present tense is vacuous. Snippets 6.

Sauerland, Uli. 2003. Implicated presuppositions. Handout for a talk presented at the University of Milan Bicocca.

Sauerland, Uli. 2006. On the semantic markedness of phi features. In Daniel Habour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across modules and interfaces, Oxford University Press.

Sauerland, Uli. 2008. Implicated presuppositions. In A. Steube (ed.), Sentences and context: Language, context, and cognition, De Gruyter.

Sauerland, Uli, J. Andersen & K. Yatsushiro. 2005. The plural is semantically unmarked. In S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds.), Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, Mouton de Gruyter.

Schlenker, Philippe. 2005. The lazy Frenchman’s approach to the subjunctive: Speculations on reference to worlds and semantics defaults in the analysis of mood. In Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 2003, John Benjamins.

Schlenker, Philippe. 2012. Maximize presuposition and Gricean reasoning. Natural Language Semantics 20. 391–429.

Singh, Raj. 2011. Maximize Presupposition! and local contexts. Natural Language Semantics 19. 149–168.

Spector, Benjamin. 2014. Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity. Semantics and Pragmatics 11(7). 1–61.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1973. Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2. 447– 457.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presupposition. In M. Munitz & P. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosphy, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3947

Add comment