Deriving Reduplicants in Prosodic-Morphology Typologies

Natalie DelBusso

Abstract


Prosodic factors affect morpheme form. Reduplicative morphemes often take the shape of the prosodic units syllable, foot, or prosodic word, regardless of the size of the base to which they attach. Some reduplicants also vary depending on the shape of the base. McCarthy & Prince's (1986, 1993, 1995) work in Prosodic Morphology argues that such effects follow from the interaction of prosodic and morphological constraints without direct reference to reduplicant size.

In this study, I determine the assumptions that are required to produce uniform reduplicative paradigms with the three basic types, syllable, foot and total, from the interaction of constraints in a prosodic system. 'Uniform' refers to a reduplicant that is the same size across reduplicative bases of different lengths. I systematically analyze the ranking structure of three complete factorial typologies of reduplication built on a basic stress system with well-studied properties (nGX, Alber & Prince, in prep.). 

Each subsequent system adds a single constraint to CON. A uniform one-syllable reduplicant is obtainable from pure prosody along with the requirement in GEN that morphemes be overtly realized. Total reduplication requires a single constraint referring to the reduplicant and requiring that it be total (BR.Max). Uniform bisyllabic foot reduplication only arises when the system includes a constraint relating prosodic and morphological constituents through alignment of their edges. These reduplication patterns emerge in the typologies along with a variety of non-uniform, base-dependent patterns.

Keywords


Prosodic Morphology, Formal Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alber, Birgit & Prince, Alan. In prep. Typologies.

DelBusso, Natalie. 2014. Paradigmatic nonuniformity: Prosodic effects on reduplicative form. Ms. Rutgers University.

Dixon, R.M.W. 1977. A Grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge University Press.

Downing, Laura. 2006. Canonical forms in prosodic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Faust, Norma. 1973. Lecciones para el aprendizaje del idioma Shipibo-Conibo. Instituto Linguistico de Verano.

González, Carolina. 2005. Phonologically-conditioned allomorphy in Panoan: Towards and analysis. UCLA Working

Papers in Linguistics 11: Papers in Phonology 6: 39-56.

Hall, Nancy 2000. Max-position drives iterative footing. In Karine Megerdoomian and Leora Anne Barel (eds.),

WCCFL 20 Proceedings, 101-114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Hyde, Brett 2012a. The odd-parity input problem in metrical stress theory. Phonology 29: 383-431.

Hyde, Brett. 2012b. Alignment constraints. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 789-836.

Hyslop, Catriona. 2001. The Lolovoli dialect of the North-East Ambae languages, Vanuatu. Canberra, Australia: Pacific

Linguistics.

Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin. 2012. Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. In Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Kawahara,

Takahito Shinya, & Mariko Sugahara (eds.) Prosody matters: Essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, 280-303.

Advances in Optimality Theory, London: Equinox.

Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re: Reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 11(3): 435-482.

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1986. Prosodic Morphology. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and

Brandeis University, Waltham, Mass.

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1993. Prosodic Morphology: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. RuCCS-TR-3.

New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. ROA-482, http://roa.rutgers.edu.

McCarthy, John J. & Prince, Alan. 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In

Mercè Gonzàlez (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 24: 333-379. Amherst, MA: GLSA. ROA-13, http://roa.rutgers.edu.

McManus, Hope. in prep. Interactions of stress and deletion in M, F-OT. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.

Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Reduplicative constructions. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human languages.

Volume 3: Word structure, 297-334. Stanford University Press.

Prince, Alan. 2002. Entailed Ranking Arguments. ROA-500, http://roa.rutgers.edu.

Prince, Alan, Tesar, Bruce, & Merchant, Nazarré. 2013. OTWorkplace. Available at: http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/~prince/.

Rehg, Kenneth .L. & Sohl, Damian G. 1981. Ponapean Reference Grammar. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v2i0.3074

Copyright (c) 2016 Natalie DelBusso

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/