Selectional Effects in Allomorph Competition

Samantha Gordon Danner

Abstract


This paper uses English demonyms – the name for inhabitants of a particular region, such as Californian or Icelander – to investigate a combination of phonological and non-phonological factors that drive conditioned allomorphy. A corpus study of English demonyms found that hypothesized phonological conditioning factors of demonym allomorphy such as base stress and base syllable count did not fully account for alternation in demonym allomorphy. In a related experiment that tested native English speakers’ preferences for demonym allomorphs among real and fictional place names, additional non-phonological factors such as familiarity and frequency were also considered. The experiment results showed that place names noted as unfamiliar by participants had different conditioning factors than phonologically similar place names from the corpus study. The corpus study and experimental results highlight the need to consider both phonological factors and non-phonological factors in the study of conditioned allomorphy.

Keywords


Conditioned Allomorphy; Demonyms

Full Text:

PDF

References


Becker, Michael. (2009). Phonological trends in the lexicon: The role of constraints (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Benua, Laura. (1997). Transderivational Identity: Phonological Relations between Words (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Booij, Geert. (1997). Allomorphy and the Autonomy of Morphology. Folia Linguistica, 31(1-2), 25–56.

Bybee, Joan. (2001). Phonology and Language Use. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Davies, Mark. (2008). The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.

Lapointe, Steven G. (1999). Stem Selection and OT. Yearbook of Morphology 1999, 263-297. Springer Netherlands.

Mascaró, Joan. (2007). External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 715–736.

Nevins, Andrew. (2011). Phonologically-Conditioned Allomorph Selection. In C. Ewen, E. Hume, M. Van Oostendorp, & K. Rice (Eds.), The Companion to Phonology (pp. 2357–2382).

Paster, Mary. (2009). Explaining phonological conditions on affixation: Evidence from suppletive allomorphy and affix ordering. Word Structure 2(1), 18-37.

Pater, Joe. (2007). The locus of exceptionality: Morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. (No. 32). University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics (Vol. 32). Amherst, MA.

Pater, Joe, & Coetzee, Andries. (2005). Lexically Specific Constraints: Gradience, Learnability, and Perception. In Proceedings of the 3rd Seoul international Conference on Phonology. 85–119.

Plag, Ingo. (1998). Morphological haplology in a constraint-based morpho-phonology. Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages, 199-215.

Prince, Alan., & Smolensky, Paul. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. John Wiley and Sons.

Qualtrics. (2014). Qualtrics Research Suite. Provo, UT: Qualtrics.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. (1999). Phonological constraints on English word formation. Yearbook of Morphology 1998, p. 225-287. Springer Netherlands.

Smith, Brian W. (2013). -(a)licious: a new morpheme obeys existing constraints (Ms). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

U.S. Government Printing Office. (2008). Style Manual: An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government printing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Underhill, Robert. (1976). Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Wolf, Matthew. (2008). Optimal Interleaving: Serial Phonology-Morphology Interaction in a constraint-based model (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Wolf, Matthew. (2013). Candidate chains, unfaithful spell-out, and outwards-looking phonologically-conditioned allomorphy. Morphology, 23(2), 145–178.

Zuraw, Kie. (2000). Patterned Exceptions in Phonology (Doctoral Dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.

Zuraw, Kie. (2010). A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 28(2), 417–472.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v2i0.3763

Copyright (c) 2016 Samantha Gordon Danner

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/