{"id":2549,"date":"2013-06-19T21:01:56","date_gmt":"2013-06-19T19:01:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elanguage.net\/blogs\/booknotices\/?p=2549"},"modified":"2013-06-19T21:01:56","modified_gmt":"2013-06-19T19:01:56","slug":"textual-choices-in-discourse-a-view-from-cognitive-linguistics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/?p=2549","title":{"rendered":"Textual choices in discourse: A view from cognitive linguistics"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;\">\n<p align=\"left\"><strong>Textual choices in discourse:\u00a0A view from cognitive linguistics.<\/strong>\u00a0Ed. by\u00a0<strong>Barbara Dancygier, Jos\u00e9 Sanders, <\/strong><strong>and<\/strong><strong> Lieven Vandelanotte<\/strong>. (Benjamins current topics 40.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012. Pp. v, 198. ISBN\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/title\/textual-choices-in-discourse-a-view-from-cognitive-linguistics\/oclc\/805702846&amp;referer=brief_results\">9789027202598<\/a>. $128 (Hb).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p align=\"right\">Reviewed by <a href=\"http:\/\/linguistlist.org\/people\/personal\/get-personal-page2.cfm?PersonID=227710\">Zhen-qiang Fan<\/a>, Zhejiang Gongshang University<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The book contains papers which were originally published in the journal <em>English text construction<\/em> 3:2 (2010). In this collection, various models from cognitive linguistics (CL) are drawn upon to explain the cognitive mechanism of the stylistic choices in a variety of genres such as literature, journalistic prose, lectures, and radio interviews. The aim is to demonstrate \u2018how recent research in CL has started expanding the range of facts to be explained and reaching beyond the traditionally conceived boundaries of linguistic inquiry\u2019 (1).<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">The book includes an introduction, eight articles, acknowledgements, and an index. The editors\u2019 introductory remarks introduce the background and the organization of the whole book. On the basis of frame semantics, fictive motion, and conceptual blending, <strong>Mike Borkent<\/strong> proposes a new framework to show how embodied knowledge is utilized for understanding visual poems and other multimodal texts. <strong>Barbara Dancygier<\/strong> discusses the use of alternativity and stance in dramatic and poetic discourse, revealing mechanisms such as frame-evocating, counterfactuality, causation, and blending. The concept of joint attention is introduced by <strong>Vera Tobin<\/strong> to appreciate the texts of literary modernism. <strong>Jos\u00e9 Sanders, <\/strong>using the mental space model, aims to explain how the intertwining of voices is represented by linguistic form in journalistic texts.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\"><strong>Elena Semino<\/strong>\u2019s chapter illustrates the power of blending theory in accounting for the rhetorical use of \u2018unrealistic\u2019 scenarios in expository and argumentative texts involving metaphorical creativity. Also relying on blending theory, <strong>El\u017cbieta G\u00f3rska<\/strong> scrutinizes novel multimodal metaphors used in BBC lectures, and the use of \u2018verbo-musical\u2019 metaphors in particular. <strong>Carol Lynn Moder<\/strong>, by integrating blending theory and a usage-based approach to grammatical constructions, investigates metaphorical expressions in their discourse context (i.e. American radio news magazines). The book ends with the editors\u2019 conclusion, which evaluates all of the contributions in the book and suggests possibilities for future research.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">This collection succeeds in achieving its goal of offering \u2018a better understanding of genre differences\u2019 and \u2018a clearer appreciation of the applicability of the cognitive framework now in use\u2019 (185). On the one hand, it opens a new window to discourse genres from the perspective of CL, either by proposing a unified model (e.g. Mike Borkent\u2019s article), or by borrowing notions that are considered to belong to a broadly conceived CL (e.g. joint attention). On the other hand, it contributes to CL by \u2018expanding the range of facts to be explained\u2019 and making CL reach \u2018beyond the traditionally conceived boundaries of linguistic inquiry\u2019 (1). Moreover, some researchers pose new challenges for CL. For instance, Dancygier argues that poetic discourse challenges some claims of constructional grammar (40), and Semino warns that blending theory needs to pay greater attention to interpretative variability and genre differences (112).<\/p>\n<p>Overall, this book shows the cross-fertilization between CL and discourse analysis, and is a great resource for anyone interested in these areas.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Textual choices in discourse:\u00a0A view from cognitive linguistics.\u00a0Ed. by\u00a0Barbara Dancygier, Jos\u00e9 Sanders, and Lieven Vandelanotte. (Benjamins current topics 40.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012. Pp. v, 198. ISBN\u00a09789027202598. $128 (Hb). Reviewed by Zhen-qiang Fan, Zhejiang Gongshang University The book contains papers which were originally published in the journal English text construction 3:2 (2010). In this collection, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2549"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2551,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549\/revisions\/2551"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}