{"id":262,"date":"2010-02-21T10:00:27","date_gmt":"2010-02-21T08:00:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elanguage.net\/blogs\/booknotices\/?p=262"},"modified":"2010-02-03T12:46:06","modified_gmt":"2010-02-03T10:46:06","slug":"the-acquisition-of-syntax-in-romance-languages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/?p=262","title":{"rendered":"The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;\"><strong>The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages<\/strong>. Ed. by <strong>Vincent Torrens<\/strong> and <strong>Linda Escobar<\/strong>. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. Pp. 421. ISBN <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/oclc\/69680198&amp;referer=brief_results\">9789027253019<\/a>. $150 (Hb).<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Reviewed by <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fsu.edu\/~modlang\/divisions\/spanish\/reglero.html\"><strong>Lara Reglero<\/strong><\/a>, <em>Florida State University<\/em><\/p>\n<p>This book is a collection of selected papers presented at \u2018The Romance Turn\u2019, a workshop on first and second language acquisition held in Madrid in 2004. The book is divided into five parts: Part 1, \u2018Clitics, determiners and pronouns\u2019; Part 2, \u2018Verbs, auxiliaries and inflection\u2019; Part 3, \u2018Movement and resumptive pronouns\u2019; Part 4, \u2018Syntax\/discourse interface\u2019; and Part 5, \u2018L2 acquisition\u2019. All of the papers adopt a generative approach to the study of language acquisition.<\/p>\n<p>Part 1 opens with \u2018The production of SE and SELF anaphors in Spanish and Dutch children\u2019 by <strong>Sergio Baauw<\/strong>, <strong>Marieke Kuipers<\/strong>, <strong>Esther Ruigendijk<\/strong>, and <strong>Fernando Cuetos<\/strong>, who show that Spanish children perform like adults on <em>se<\/em> anaphors but have difficulty with <em>self<\/em> anaphors, in contrast to Dutch children, who exhibit exactly the opposite behavior. In \u2018On the acquisition of ambiguous valency-marking morphemes: Insights from the acquisition of French SE\u2019, <strong>Isabelle Barri\u00e8re<\/strong> and <strong>Marjorie Perlman Lorch<\/strong> propose a modified version of the maturation hypothesis to explain the order of acquisition of French <em>se<\/em> and related constructions. <strong>Anna Gavarr\u00f3<\/strong>, <strong>Ana Teresa P\u00e9rez-Leroux<\/strong>, and <strong>Thomas Roeper<\/strong>\u2019s \u2018Definite and bare noun contrasts in child Catalan\u2019 examines the acquisition of definites and bare nouns in child Catalan from a semantic perspective. In \u2018Null arguments in monolingual children: A comparison of Italian and French\u2019, <strong>Natasha M\u00fcller<\/strong>, <strong>Katrin Shmitz<\/strong>, <strong>Katja Cantone<\/strong>, and <strong>Tanja Kupisch<\/strong> account for the differences in the acquisition of object clitics in child French and Italian by proposing different licensing strategies for each language. <strong>Maren Pannemann<\/strong> explores crosslinguistic interaction in the bilingual acquisition of determiners and adjectives in \u2018Prenominal elements in French-Germanic bilingual first language acquisition: Evidence for cross-linguistic influence\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>In Part 2, <strong>Claudia Caprin<\/strong> and <strong>Maria Teresa Guasti<\/strong>\u2019s \u2018A cross-sectional study on the use of \u201cbe\u201d in early Italian\u2019 analyzes the different omission rates of copula and auxiliary \u2018be\u2019 in child Italian. In \u2018Patterns of copula omission in Italian child language\u2019, <strong>Elisa Franchi<\/strong> investigates the omission rates of the Italian copula in declarative contexts and their absence in <em>wh<\/em>-contexts. In \u2018Looking for the universal core of the RI stage\u2019, <strong>Manola Salustri<\/strong> and <strong>Nina Hyams<\/strong> propose that the imperative is the equivalent of the RI stage in null subject languages. <strong>Vincent Torrens<\/strong>, <strong>Linda Escobar<\/strong>, and <strong>Kenneth Wexler<\/strong>\u2019s \u2018The acquisition of experiencers in Spanish L1 and the external argument requirement hypothesis\u2019 explores the difficulties Spanish-speaking children exhibit with the acquisition of psych verbs that do not project a subject as their external argument. <strong>Jacqueline van Kampen<\/strong> studies how tense\/agreement omission and root peripheral truncation relate in \u2018Early operators and late topic-drop\/pro-drop\u2019.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Elaine Grolla<\/strong>\u2019s\u2018The acquisition of A- and A\u2032-bound pronouns in Brazilian Portuguese\u2019 opens Part 3 by providing a unified analysis for the acquisition of pronominal elements in Brazilian Portuguese. In \u2018Acquiring long-distance <em>wh<\/em>-questions in L1 Spanish: A longitudinal investigation\u2019, <strong>Mar\u00eda Junkal Gui\u00e9rrez Mangado<\/strong> accounts for the nonadult constructions produced by a Spanish-speaking child while acquiring long-distance <em>wh<\/em>-questions. <strong>Magda Oiry<\/strong> and <strong>Hamida Demirdache<\/strong> argue in their article, \u2018Evidence from L1 acquisition for the syntax of <em>wh<\/em>-scope marking in French\u2019, that French-speaking children use nonadult scope marking strategies to produce long-distance questions.<\/p>\n<p>In Part 4, <strong>Jo\u00e3o Costa<\/strong> and <strong>Kriszta Szendr\u00f6i<\/strong>\u2019s \u2018Acquisition of focus marking in European Portuguese: Evidence for a unified approach to focus\u2019 explores whether children can distinguish between syntactic and prosodic marking of focus in European Portuguese. In \u2018Subject pronouns in bilinguals: Interface or maturation?\u2019, <strong>Manuela Pinto<\/strong> investigates the acquisition of subject pronouns by two Dutch-Italian bilinguals.<\/p>\n<p>In Part 5, <strong>Claudia Borgonovo<\/strong>, <strong>Joyce Bruhn de Garavito<\/strong>, and <strong>Philippe Pr\u00e9vost<\/strong>\u2019s \u2018Is the semantics\/syntax interface vulnerable in L2 acquisition? Focus on mood distinctions clauses in L2 Spanish\u2019 shows that interface phenomena can be acquired, at least in the domain of the interpretation of DPs marked by mood in Spanish. In \u2018The development of the syntax-discourse interface: Greek learners of Spanish\u2019, <strong>Crist\u00f3bal Lozano<\/strong> argues that L2 learners\u2019 difficulties with discursive focus are due to a deficit with the uninterpretable [focus] feature. Finally, in \u2018Beyond the syntax of the null subject parameter: A look at the discourse-pragmatic distribution of null and overt subjects by L2 learners of Spanish\u2019, <strong>Silvina Montrul<\/strong> and <strong>Celeste Rodr\u00edguez Louro<\/strong> examine how L2 learners acquire the morphosyntactic and discourse-pragmatic aspects of Spanish subjects.<\/p>\n<p><em>The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages <\/em>provides an extensive and thorough collection of papers that will be of great interest to researchers working on any syntactic aspect of Romance language acquisition from a generative perspective.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The acquisition of syntax in Romance languages. Ed. by Vincent Torrens and Linda Escobar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2006. Pp. 421. ISBN 9789027253019. $150 (Hb). Reviewed by Lara Reglero, Florida State University This book is a collection of selected papers presented at \u2018The Romance Turn\u2019, a workshop on first and second language acquisition held in Madrid [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=262"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":264,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/262\/revisions\/264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}