{"id":690,"date":"2010-05-29T22:00:56","date_gmt":"2010-05-29T20:00:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/elanguage.net\/blogs\/booknotices\/?p=690"},"modified":"2010-05-11T14:07:58","modified_gmt":"2010-05-11T12:07:58","slug":"formulaic-sequences","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/?p=690","title":{"rendered":"Formulaic sequences"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"margin-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;\"><strong>Formulaic sequences<\/strong>: Acquisition, processing and use. Ed. by <strong>Norbert Schmitt<\/strong>. (Language learning &amp; language teaching 9.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. Pp. 304. ISBN <a href=\"http:\/\/www.worldcat.org\/title\/formulaic-sequences-acquisition-processing-and-use\/oclc\/54073892&amp;referer=brief_results\">1588115003<\/a>. $54.<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Reviewed by <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/engl.iastate.edu\/directory\/doakey\">David Oakey<\/a><\/strong>, <em>University of Birmingham<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Formulaic sequences have a precise, if elastic, definition: \u2018a sequence, continuous or discontinuous, of words or other meaning elements, which is, or appears to be, prefabricated: that is, stored and retrieved whole from memory at the time of use, rather than being subject to generation or analysis by the language grammar\u2019 (Wray, Alison. 1999: Formulaic language in learners and native<em> <\/em>speakers<em>. Language teaching<\/em> 32.4.214). The written and spoken formulaic sequences studied in <em>Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use<\/em> range from <em>you<\/em> <em>know<\/em> to <em>something like that <\/em>to <em>I don\u2019t know what to do<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Norbert Schmitt<\/strong> and <strong>Robert Carter<\/strong>, in their wide-ranging overview of the field in the introductory chapter to this book, make no claim as to the status of formulaic sequences in any mentalist theories of language, but argue that the ubiquity of these units in language data suggests that their cognitive role\u2014in first and second language acquisition, reception, and production\u2014is an important one. The papers in this collection draw on research methods from the fields of corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, and psycholinguistics, as discussed in the chapter by <strong>John Read<\/strong> and <strong>Paul Nation<\/strong>, to add weight to this claim.<\/p>\n<p>The chapter by Schmitt, <strong>Zolt\u00e1n D\u00f6rnyei<\/strong>, <strong>Svenja Adolphs<\/strong>, and <strong>Valerie Durow<\/strong> presents the results of a longitudinal study that measured the acquisition of receptive and productive knowledge of formulaic sequences by second language learners. <strong>Martha A. Jones<\/strong> and <strong>Sandra Haywood<\/strong> measure in more detail the awareness and production of formulaic sequences by learners of academic English. Two chapters examine the relationship between the acquisition of formulaic sequences and the extent to which learners of English studying in the UK can become socially integrated with the \u2018host\u2019 culture. D\u00f6rnyei, Durow, and <strong>Khawla Zahran<\/strong> describe a qualitative study, while the chapter by Adolphs and Durow uses a more quantitative approach. All these studies conclude that raising learners\u2019 awareness of target formulaic sequences increases their ability to recognize\u2014but not necessarily use\u2014these items.<\/p>\n<p>The next chapters describe attempts to measure the cognitive processing of spoken and written formulaic sequences. For a frequently recurring cluster of words to be termed a formulaic sequence, it needs to be shown that it is \u2018stored\u2019 as a holistic unit in the minds of proficient language users. Schmitt, <strong>Sarah Grandage<\/strong>, and Adolphs attempt to do this by comparing native and nonnative speakers\u2019 use of formulaic sequences in a dictation recall task, while the chapters by <strong>Geoffrey Underwood<\/strong>, Schmitt, and <strong>Adam Galpin<\/strong> and by Schmitt and Underwood analyze, using different tools, how readers process a written text \u2018seeded\u2019 with target formulaic sequences.<\/p>\n<p>Two chapters look at formulaic sequences in languages other than English. An unusually wide comparison is made by <strong>Carol Sp\u00f6ttl<\/strong> and <strong>Michael McCarthy<\/strong>, who compare knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3, and L4, while <strong>Alison Wray<\/strong> measures the acquisition of Welsh formulaic sequences by a learner of Welsh. The chapter by <strong>Koenraad Kuiper<\/strong> sits less well with the others, but provides a detailed account of how ballad singers, auctioneers, and sports commentators use formulaic sequences in the acquisition of their respective oral traditions.<\/p>\n<p>Although slightly repetitive in places\u2014every chapter starts by citing important prior research that has already been introduced in the first chapter\u2014this collection is a valuable addition to the fields of language description, acquisition, and phraseology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use. Ed. by Norbert Schmitt. (Language learning &amp; language teaching 9.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2004. Pp. 304. ISBN 1588115003. $54. Reviewed by David Oakey, University of Birmingham Formulaic sequences have a precise, if elastic, definition: \u2018a sequence, continuous or discontinuous, of words or other meaning elements, which is, or appears [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/690"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=690"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/690\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":691,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/690\/revisions\/691"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/journals.linguisticsociety.org\/booknotices\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}