Wh-word conjunction as a test for argumenthood and obligatoriness

Paul B. Melchin, Ida Toivonen

Abstract


Some wh-words are easier to conjoin than others. For example, it has been noted that adjunct wh-words are easier to conjoin than argument wh-words.  We review previous analyses of wh-word conjunction and evaluate them in light of data collected from a new acceptability judgement study. Our study replicates some previous findings but it also adds some new data to the puzzle. We further revisit the idea that wh-word conjunction can be used as a test for argumenthood, and we conclude that it can, with some caveats.  In addition, we conclude that wh-word conjunction can be used as a test for obligatoriness, but only in arguments.  The test does not distinguish between obligatory and optional adjuncts.

Keywords


wh-words; argumenthood; syntax; psycholinguistics

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v3i1.4295

Copyright (c) 2018 Paul B. Melchin, Ida Toivonen

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Donate to the Open-Access Fund of the LSA

Linguistic Society of America


Advancing the Scientific Study of Language

ISSN (online): 2473-8689

This publication is made available for free to readers and with no charge to authors thanks in part to your continuing LSA membership and your donations to the open access fund.

The LSA is pleased to announce that Steve Anderson, former LSA President, has offered to match all donations made to the Society’s open access fund, up to $10,000, between now and the end of 2019. more ...