Evidence for perceptual hypercorrection in American r-dissimilation: A pilot study

Authors

  • Nancy Hall California State University Long Beach http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-1375
  • Bianca Godinez California State University Long Beach
  • Megan Walsh California State University Long BEach
  • Irene Orellana California State University Long Beach
  • Coleen Villegas California State University Long Beach

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4549

Keywords:

dissimilation, hypercorrection, rhotics, speech perception

Abstract

We tested Ohala's (1993) theory that dissimilation results from perceptual hypercorrection for assimilation. We created nonce words by splicing syllables containing /r/ to continuations that either did or did not contain another /r/. When listeners were asked to type these nonce words, they were significantly more likely to omit the first /r/ if there was a later /r/. This is consistent with Ohala's claim that one rhotic can perceptually mask the presence of another rhotic. The patterns of r-dropping mimics the characteristics of real English r-dissimilation, in which speakers tend to drop the first /r/ from words like surprise. We argue that perceptual errors are a plausible cause of the actuation of r-dissimilation, although other articulatory or processing constraints may contribute to its persistence.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-15

How to Cite

Hall, Nancy, Bianca Godinez, Megan Walsh, Irene Orellana, and Coleen Villegas. 2019. “Evidence for Perceptual Hypercorrection in American R-Dissimilation: A Pilot Study”. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 4 (1): 52:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4549.