When faultless disagreement is not so faultless: What widely-held opinions can tell us about subjective adjectives

Authors

  • Elsi Kaiser University of Southern California
  • Deniz Rudin University of Southern California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4757

Keywords:

subjective predicates, predicates of personal taste, faultless disagreement, experimental linguistics

Abstract

When two people disagree about matters of taste, neither of them is in the wrong: There is nothing contradictory in an exchange where one person says 'The rollercoaster was fun!' and the other responds 'No, it was not fun.' This is in sharp contrast to disagreements about objective facts. This phenomenon is known as faultless disagreement, and is at the heart of theorizing about subjective adjectives. Despite this fundamental role, little scrutiny has been given to the empirical profile of faultless disagreement. Our experiment addresses two questions: (i) Is faultless disagreement a property of predicates, or of pairs of a predicate and an argument? (ii) Is faultless disagreement a binary phenomenon? Our results show that judgments of faultless disagreement (i) are modulated by the choice of argument, reflecting the prevalence of opinions in the relevant population, and (ii) fall into at least three distinct tiers, suggesting that faultless disagreement is a gradient phenomenon.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-23

How to Cite

Kaiser, Elsi, and Deniz Rudin. 2020. “When Faultless Disagreement Is Not so Faultless: What Widely-Held Opinions Can Tell Us about Subjective Adjectives”. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 5 (1): 698–707. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v5i1.4757.