Processing gradable adjectives in context: A Visual World study

Helena Aparicio, Ming Xiang, Christopher Kennedy

Abstract


Both relative adjectives (RAs) like ‘big’ and absolute adjectives (AAs) like ‘empty’ are sensitive to the context: in the former case, the context determines how much size is required to count as big; in the latter, the context determines how much deviation from total emptiness is allowed to count as empty. Whereas it is generally agreed that the role of context with RAs is to fix the value of a threshold variable, the status of absolute adjective thresholds, and therefore the role of context in their interpretation, remains an object of debate. Some researchers have argued that all gradable adjectives have context-sensitive threshold variables that are assigned values by the same mechanisms (Lassiter & Goodman 2013). Others have claimed that AAs have fixed, endpoint-oriented meanings and that sensitivity to context arises from pragmatic reasoning about imprecision (Kennedy 2007; Syrett, Kennedy & Lidz 2009; van Rooij 2011; Burnett 2014; Qing & Franke 2014). In an eye-tracking Visual World experiment, we investigate RAs and AAs used as restrictive modifiers. We find that target identification is significantly faster for both types of adjectives when the visual context supports a restrictive interpretation of the predicate, although this effect is considerably delayed in the case of AAs. We conclude that for RAs, the target facilitation effect is driven by the lexical semantics of the predicate itself. However, it is argued that the extra processing cost observed with AAs results from pragmatic reasoning about imprecision. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Altmann, Gerry & Mark Steedman. 1988. Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30(3). 191–238.

Burnett, Heather. 2014. A delineation solution to the puzzles of absolute adjectives. Linguistics and philosophy 37(1). 1–39.

Frank, Michael C. & Noah D. Goodman. 2012. Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science 336(6084). 998–998.

Kennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1). 1–45.

Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2). 345–381.

Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally. 2010. Color, context, and compositional- ity. Synthese 174(1). 79–98.

Klein, Ewan. 1980. A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4. 1–45.

Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Approximate interpretations of number words: a case of strategic communication. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds.), Cognitive foundations of interpretation, 111–126. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Philosophische Fakultät II.

Lasersohn, Peter. 1999. Pragmatic halos. Language 75(3). 522–551.

Lassiter, Daniel & Noah D. Goodman. 2013. Context, scale structure, and statistics in the interpretation of positive-form adjectives. In Proceedings of SALT 23, 587–610.

Lassiter, Daniel & Noah D. Goodman. 2015. Adjectival vagueness in a Bayesian model of interpretation. Synthese.

McNally, Louise. 2011. The relative role of property type and scale structure in explaining the bahavior of gradable adjectives.

Qing, Ciyang & Michael Franke. 2014. Gradable adjectives, vagueness, and optimal language use: a speaker-oriented model. In Proceedings of SALT 24, 23–41.

van Rooij, Robert. 2011. Vagueness and linguistics. In G. Ronzitti (ed.), Vagueness: a guide, chap. 6, 123–179. Dordrecht: Springer.

Rotstein, Carmen & Yoad Winter. 2004. Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12(3). 259–288.

Sassoon, Galit & Assaf Toledo. 2011. Absolute and relative adjectives and their comparison classes.

Sedivy, Julie C. 2003. Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(1). 3–23.

Sedivy, Julie C. 2005. Evaluating explanations for referential context effects: Evidence for gricean meachanisms in online language interpretation. In John C. Trueswell & Michael K. Tanenhaus (eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action tradi- tions, 345–364. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Sedivy, Julie C., Michael K. Tanenhaus, Craig G. Chambers & Gregory N. Carl- son. 1999. Achieving incremental semantic interpretation through contextual representation. Congnition 71(2). 109–147.

Syrett, Kristen, Christopher Kennedy & Jeffrey Lidz. 2009. Meaning and context in children’s understanding of gradable adjectives. Journal of Semantics 27(1). 1–35.

Tanenhaus, Michael K., Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information during spoken language comprehension. Science 268(5217). 1632–1634.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v25i0.3128