Are All Concessive Scalar Particles the Same? Probing into Spanish "Siquiera"

Luis Alonso-Ovalle

Abstract


Concessive scalar particles (CSPs) (Crnic 2011a,b) (Slovenian magari, Greek esto, and Spanish siquiera, among others) are focus sensitive polarity items that get licensed in a variety of non-veridical contexts, where they trigger a characteristic interpretation: CSPs convey a strengthening effect in downward entailing environments, a ‘settle for less’ interpretation in modal contexts, and a negative bias in questions. This paper explores the characterization of this class of items by probing into Spanish siquiera. The paper reveals differences between siquiera and magari that challenge a straightforward extension to siquiera of the analysis of CSPs presented in Crnic 2011a and Crnic 2011b and shows that the analysis of esto in Giannakidou 2007 does not cover siquiera either —partly for reasons already pointed out for magari by Crnic. The central insights of Crnic's and Giannakidou’s work are nevertheless reconciled in an alternative analysis. The picture that emerges is that CSPs might uniformly convey an existential meaning that determines a set of alternatives, but differ with respect to the role that these alternatives play in determining their interpretation and distribution. 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alonso-Ovalle, Luis. 2009. Even and biased questions: The case of Spanish siquiera. In Satoshi Ito & Ed Cormany (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, 1–18. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Büring, Daniel. 2008. The least at least can do. In Charles B. Chang & Han- nah J. Hayne (eds.), Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114–20. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in Grammar. Polarity, Free Choice and Interven- tion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crnic ̆, Luka. 2011a. Getting Even. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.

Crnic ̆, Luka. 2011b. On the meaning and distribution of concessive scalar particles.

In Lena Fainleib, Nick LaCara & Tangsook Park (eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 143–156. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

Gast, Volker & Johan van der Auwera. 2011. Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language 87(1). 2–54.

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1). 39–81.

Guerzoni, Elena. 2004. Even-NPIs in yes/no questions. Natural Language Semantics 12(4). 319–343.

Heim, Irene. 1984. A note on negative polarity and downward entailingness. In Charles Jones & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of 14th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 14, 98–107. Amherst, MA: GLSA.

Herburger, Elena. 2003. A note on Spanish ni siquiera, even, and the analysis of NPIs. Probus 237–256.

Kadmon, Nirit & Fred Landman. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16(4). 353–422.

Kennedy, Christopher. 2015. A “de-fregean” semantics (and neo-gricean pragmatics) for modified and unmodified numerals. Semantics and Pragmatics 8. 1–44. Krifka, Manfred. 1991. Some remarks on polarity items. In Dietmar Zaefferer

(ed.), Semantic Universals and Universal Semantics, 150–189. Berlin: Foris-de

Gruyter.

Krifka, Manfred. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic

Analysis 25. 209–257.

Krifka, Manfred. 2003. Polarity items in questions. Handout of presentation at the

Korean Society of Logic and Information 28.06.2003. http://amor.rz.hu-berlin.

de/~h2816i3x/Talks/PolarityQuestionsKorea.ppt.

Lahiri, Utpal. 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language

Semantics 6(1). 57–123.

Lahiri, Utpal. 2008. The semantics and pragmatics of some scalar expressions in Spanish. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo XLII(2). 359–389.

Lahiri, Utpal. 2010. Some evens are even (if) ...only: The concessive even in Spanish. Ms. JNU, New Delhi.

Nakanishi, Kimiko & Hotze Rullmann. 2009. More about at least. Handout of a talk presented at The meeting of semanticists active in Canada, May 26, 2009. http://sites.google.com/site/kimikonakanishi/research.

Penka, Doris. 2015. At most at last. In Eva Csipak & Hedde Zeijlstra (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19, 463–480.

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst, MA: University of Mas- sachusetts at Amherst PhD dissertation.

van Rooy, Robert. 2003. Negative polarity items in questions: Strength as relevance. Journal of Semantics 20(3). 239–273.

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2000. Notes on even. Ms. University of Stuttgart. http: //webpages.mcgill.ca/staff/group4/bschwa8/web/pdf/even.pdf.

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2005. Scalar additive particles in negative context. Natural Language Semantics 13(2). 125–168.

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2016. Consistency preservation in quantity implicature: The case of at least. Semantics and Pragmatics 9. 1–47.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v26i0.3820