Prosodic Effects on Factive Presupposition Projection

Kajsa Djärv, Hezekiah Akiva Bacovcin

Abstract


This paper reports a follow-up to Tonhauser (2016) investigating the interaction between prosodically-mediated pragmatics and factive presupposition projection. We replicate Tonhauser’s finding that prosody does have an impact on factive presupposition projection (stress on material in the embedded clause decrease the strength of projection). However, we found that this difference was substantially smaller than the difference between factive and non-factive predicates. We also found that stress placement impacted projection judgments for non-factive clauses as well. We outline a hypothesis for a general pragmatic mechanism for deriving non-assertive inferences from prosody and discuss how that mechanism interacts with the projection of factive presuppositions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrusán, Márta. 2011. Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers. Linguistics and Philosophy 34. 491–535.

Abrusán, Márta. 2016. Presupposition cancellation: explaining the ‘soft—hard’ trigger distinction. Natural Language Semantics 24(2). 165–202.

Abusch, Dorit. 2002. Lexical alternatives as a source of pragmatic presupposition. In Brendan Jackson (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 12, 1–19.

Abusch, Dorit. 2010. Presupposition Triggering from Alternatives. Journal of Semantics 27. 37–80.

Anand, Pranav & Valentine Hacquard. 2014. Factivity, belief and discourse. In Luka Crnic & Uli Sauerland (eds.), ˇ The Art and Craft of Semantics: A Festschrift for Irene Heim, 69–90. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

Beaver, David. 2010. Have you noticed that your belly button lint colour is related to the colour of your clothing? In R. Bäuerle, U. Reyle & E. Zimmerman (eds.), Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays Offered to Hans Kamp, Oxford: Elsevier.

Chemla, Emanuel. 2009. An experimental approach to adverbial modification. In U. Sauerland & K Yatsushiro (eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: from experiment to theory, 249–263. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Djärv, Kajsa, Jérémy Zehr & Florian Schwarz. 2017. Cognitive vs. emotive factives: An experimental differentiation. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21, .

Gazdar, Gerald. 1979. Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form. New York: Academic Press.

Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Daniel P. Flickinger (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL 2, 114125. Stanford University, Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.

Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674.

Hothorn, Torsten & Achim Zeileis. 2015. partykit: A modular toolkit for recursive partytioning in R. Journal of Machine Learning Research 16. 3905–3909. http://jmlr.org/papers/v16/hothorn15a.html.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Some observations on factivity. Papers in Linguistics 4. 55–69.

Roberts, Craige. 1996. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Working Papers in Linguistics-Ohio State University Department of Linguistics 91–136.

Roberts, Craige. 2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics and Pragmatics 5. 1–69.

Romoli, Jacopo. 2015. The presuppositions of soft triggers are obligatory scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics 32(2). 173–219

Van der Sandt, Rob A. 1992. Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9(4). 333–377.

Schlenker, Phillipe. 2008. Be articulate: A pragmatic theory of presupposition projection. Theoretical Linguistics 34(3). 157–212.

Simons, Mandy. 2001. On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In R. Hastings, B. Jackson & S. Zvolenszky (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 11, 431–448. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Simons, Mandy. 2007. Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117. 1034–1056.

Simons, Mandy, David Beaver, Craige Roberts & Judith Tonhauser. 2017. The best question: Explaining the projection behavior of factives. Discourse Processes 54(3). 187–206.

Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David Beaver & Craige Roberts. 2010. What projects and why. In Nan Li & David Lutz (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 20, 309–327. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, 197–213. New York: New York University Press.

Stan Development Team. 2016. rstanarm: Bayesian applied regression modeling via Stan. R package version 2.13.1. http://mc-stan.org/.

Tonhauser, Judith. 2016. Prosodic cues to presupposition projection. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory 26, 934–960.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4134