Contrastive negation and the theory of alternatives

Chris Bruno

Abstract


This paper is a contribution to the theory of focus; in particular, it is concerned with what counts as a valid focus alternative.
Empirical data from contrastive negation associating with presupposition triggers is presented, and it is observed that association with the definite article and both lead to an existence inference.
It is shown that the existence inference is unexplained by the current theory of focus, but that it can be explained by placing constraints on focus alternatives.
The constraints I propose are that focus alternatives are limited to the meanings of linguistic expressions that satisfy either Strawson-equivalence or P-equivalence.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Barwise, Jon & Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. In Philosophy, Language, and Artificial Intelligence, 241–301. Springer.

Beaver, David & Brady Clark. 2009. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. John Wiley & Sons.

Beaver, David & Emiel Krahmer. 2001. Presupposition and partiality: Back to the future. Journal of Logic, Language and information 10(2). 147–182.

Bochvar, Dmitri A. 1938. Ob odnom trechznacnom iscislenii i ego priminenii k analizu paradoksov klassiceskogo rassirennogo funkcional’nogo iscislenija. Matematiceskij Sbornik 4(46). 287–308. English translation: On a three-valued logical calculus and its application to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus, History and Philosophy of Logic, 2. 87–112.

De Jong, Franciska & Henk Verkuyl. 1985. Generalized quantifiers: the properness of their strength. In Johann van Bentham & Alexander ter Meulen (eds.), Generalized quantifiers in natural language 4, 21–43.

Fox, Danny & Roni Katzir. 2011. On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics 19(1). 87–107.

Frege, Gottlieb. 1892. Sense and reference. Philosophical Review 57(3). 209–230.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

Karttunen, Lauri. 1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 4(2). 169–193.

Pierrehumbert, Janet B & Shirley A Steele. 1989. Categories of tonal alignment in English. Phonetica 46(4). 181–196.

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.

Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. Ms.

Rooth, Mats. 1999. Association with focus or association with presupposition? In Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds.), Focus: Linguistic, cognitive, and computational perspectives, Cambridge University Press.

Sharvit, Yael. 2017. A note on (Strawson) entailment. Semantics & Pragmatics 10(1). 1–39. doi:10.3765/sp.10.1.

Strawson, Peter F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59(235). 320–344.

von Fintel, Kai. 1999. NPI Licensing, Strawson Entailment, and context dependency. Journal of Semantics 16. 97–148.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v27i0.4131