Definiteness in Akan: Familiarity and uniqueness revisited

Carla Bombi

Abstract


In the recent semantic literature, Akan is viewed as a language that distinguishes between uniqueness definites and familiarity definites (Schwarz 2009, 2013), following a proposal by Arkoh & Matthewson (2013). Based on a re-examination of previous evidence and on novel fieldwork data, this paper argues that this distinction is not supported in Akan. A novel analysis is put forward, in which the overt determiners in this language have a similar distribution to that of English the and that. Differences between English the and the Akan article nó are attributed to the availability of a definite bare noun, which is a competitor to the overt definite in Akan. The paper shows that definiteness distinctions cannot always be reduced to a uniqueness–familiarity dichotomy, and points to a more articulated view of definites cross-linguistically.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amfo, Appia Nana. 2007. Akan demonstratives. Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics 134–148.

Arkoh, Ruby & Lisa Matthewson. 2013. A familiar definite article in Akan. Lingua 123. 1–30.doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.09.012.

Barlew, Jefferson. 2014. Salience, uniqueness, and the definite determiner -te in Bulu. Semantics and Linguistic Theory 24(0). 619–639. doi:10.3765/salt.v24i0.2992. http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/24.619.

Bochnak, M. Ryan. 2016. Past time reference in a language with optional tense.

Linguistics and Philosphy 29(4). 247–294. doi:10.1007/s10988-016-9191-6.

Buba, Malami. 1997. The deictic particle di-n in hausa. African Languages and

Cultures 10(1). 29–45.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language

Semantics 6(4). 339–405.

Dayal, Veneeta. 2004. Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 393–450.doi:10.1023/B:LING.0000024420.80324.67.

Duah, Reginald Akuoko. 2013. Force dynamics and causation in Akan: University

of Ghana dissertation.

Elbourne, Paul. 2008. Demonstratives as Individual Concepts. Linguistics and

Philosophy 31(4). 409–466.

Grubic, Mira. 2015. Focus and alternative sensitivity in Ngamo (West-Chadic): University of Potsdam dissertation.

Hawkins, J.A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and

Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.

Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases: University

of Massachussets Amherst dissertation.

Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter

Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Heim, Irene & Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Oxford:

Blackwell Publishers.

Ingason, Anton Karl. 2016. Realizing morphemes in the Icelandic Noun Phrase:

University of Pennsylvania dissertation.

Jenks, Peter. 2015. Two kinds of definites in numeral classifier languages.

Semantics and Linguistic Theory 25(0). 103–124. doi:10.3765/salt.v25i0.3057.

Jenks, Peter. 2018. Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3). doi:10.1162/ling_a_00280.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1989. An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and

Philosophy 5(12). 607–653.

Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2018. Ethnologue:

Languages of the World, eighteenth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International.

http://www.ethnologue.com.

Löbner, Sebastian. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4(4). 279–326.

Lyons, Christopher. 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70(1). 369–415.

Mucha, Anne. 2015. Temporal interpretation and cross-lingusitic variation:Universität

Potsdam dissertation.

Renans, Agata. 2016. A cross-categorial definite determiner: evidence from Ga (Kwa). Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 26 23–42.

Roberts, Craige. 2002. Demonstratives as definites. In Kees van Deemter & Roger Kibble (eds.), Information sharing, 1–48. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Roberts, Craige. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 26. 287–350. doi:10.1023/A:1024157132393.

Sauerland, Uli. 2008. Implicated presupposition 581–600. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110209303.4.581.

Schwarz, Florian. 2009. Two Types of Definites in Natural Language: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.

Schwarz, Florian. 2013. Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and

Linguistics Compass 7(10). 534–559. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12048.

Šimík, Radek. 2016. On pragmatic demonstratives: The case of pragmatic discourse

anaphora in Czech. In Nadine Bade, Polina Berezovskaya & Anthea Schöller

(eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 20, 640–657.

Simonenko, Alexandra. 2014. Grammatical ingredients of definiteness: McGill

University dissertation.

Singh, Raj. 2011. Maximize Presupposition! and local context. Natural Language

Semantics 19(2). 146–168. doi:10.1007/s11050-010-9066-2.

Wespel, Johannes. 2008. Descriptions and their domains. the patterns of definiteness markings in French-related Creoles: University of Stuttgart dissertation.

Wolter, Linsey. 2006. That’s that: the semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative

noun phrases: University of California Santa Cruz dissertation.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4406

Copyright (c) 2018 Carla Bombi