Presupposition-denying uses of even

Naomi Francis

Abstract


This paper explores a puzzling contrast: even can be used in denials of presuppositions, but only when it appears below negation. I present a solution to this puzzle that makes crucial use of the additive presupposition of \emph{even}. This presupposition is controversial; I argue that the evidence used to challenge its presence does not show what it is claimed to show. I show that the puzzle is not unique to English and sketch crosslinguistic implications of the proposed analysis.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderssen, Jan. 2006. Generalized domain widening überhaupt. In Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 58–66. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Beaver, David. 1995. Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. Edinburgh, UK: University of Edinburgh dissertation.

Beaver, David & Emiel Krahmer. 2001. A partial account of presupposition projection. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10. 147–182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008371413822.

Bochvar, D.A. 1939. Ob odnom trehznachom iscislenii i ego primeneii k analizu paradoksov klassicskogo rassirennogo funkcional ’nogo iscislenija. Matematiciskij sbornik 4. 287–308. English translation (1981): On a three-valued logical calculus and its applications to the analysis of the paradoxes of the classical extended functional calculus. History and Philosophy of Logic 2, 87-112.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2006. Broaden your views: Implications of domain widening and the “logicality" of language. Linguistic Inquiry 37(4). 535–590.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2006.37.4.535.

Crniˇc, Luka. 2011. Getting even. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Fox, Danny. 2012. Presupposition projection from quantificational sentences: trivalence, local accommodation, and presupposition strengthening. Ms. Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2007. The landscape of EVEN. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1). 39–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9006-5.

Greenberg, Yael. 2016. Operating over (internal) ‘covert-based’ alternatives with scalar focus sensitive particles: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 21, 18 pages (preprint).

Greenberg, Yael & Keren Khrizman. 2012. The Hebrew bixlal: A generalized strengthening operator. In Proceedings of IATL 27, 139–162. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.

Guerzoni, Elena. 2004. Even-NPIs in yes-no questions. Natural Language Semantics 12(4). 319–343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-8739-0.

Heim, Irene. 1983. On the projection problem for presuppositions. In Daniel P. Flickinger (ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114–125. Stanford University Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.

Iatridou, Sabine & Sergei Tatevosov. 2016. Our even. Linguistics and Philosophy

295–331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-016-9190-7.

Karttunen, Lauri & Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Choon-Kyu Oh & David A. Dineen (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 11: Presupposition, 1–56. Academic Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2273633.

Kay, Paul. 1990. Even. Linguistics and Philosophy 13(1). 59–111.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00630517.

Krifka, Manfred. 1992. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Joachim Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und grammatik, vol. 4 Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte, 17–53. Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Lahiri, Utpal. 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics 6(1). 57–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008211808250.

Romoli, Jacopo. 2011. Presupposition wipe-out can’t be all or nothing: a note on conflicting presuppositions. Snippets 24. 11–12.

Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts at Amherst dissertation.

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1(1). 75–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617.

Rullmann, Hotze. 1997. Even, polarity, and scope. In Martha Gibson, Grace Wiebe & Gary Libben (eds.), Papers in experimental and theoretical linguistics, vol. 4, 40–64. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Department of Linguistics, University of Alberta.

von Stechow, Arnim. 1991. Current issues in the theory of focus. In Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales handbuch der zeitgenössischen forschung / Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, 804–825. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Wilkinson, Karina. 1996. The scope of even. Natural Language Semantics 4(3). 193–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00372819.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4409

Copyright (c) 2018 Naomi Francis