Comparative modified numerals revisited: scalar implicatures, granularity and blindness to context

Émile Enguehard

Abstract


We present a theory of the pragmatics of comparative modified numerals such as “more than~5”. Our proposal is based on the assumption that they trigger alternatives derived from discrete “granularity scales”. This is sufficient to explain the basic pattern of scalar implicatures from comparative numerals; we then show how extra assumptions of blind exhaustification and QUD uncertainty refine the prediction in that we can explain how and when comparative numerals trigger irrelevance inferences.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buccola, Brian & Andreas Haida. 2017. Obligatory irrelevance and the computation of ignorance inferences. Manuscript (July 31, 2017); lingbuzz/003600.

Cummins, Chris, Uli Sauerland & Stephanie Solt. 2012. Granularity and scalar implicature in numerical expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10988-012-9114-0.

Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice disjunction and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, 71–120. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230210752_4.

Fox, Danny & Martin Hackl. 2006. The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(5). 537–586. doi:10.1007/s10988-006-9004-4.

Fox, Danny & Roni Katzir. 2011. On the characterization of alternatives. Natural Language Semantics 19(1). 87–107. doi:10.1007/s11050-010-9065-3.

Magri, Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. Natural Language Semantics 17(3). 245–297. doi:10.1007/s11050-009-9042-x.

Mayr, Clemens. 2013. Implicatures of modified numerals. From grammar to meaning: the spontaneous logicality of language 139–171.

Nouwen, Rick. 2008. Upper-bounded no more: the exhaustive interpretation of non-strict comparison. Natural Language Semantics 16(4). 271–295. doi:10.1007/s11050-008-9034-2.

Schwarz, Bernhard. 2016. Consistency preservation in quantity implicature: The case of at least. Semantics and pragmatics 9(1). 1–47. doi:10.3765/sp.9.1.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4403

Copyright (c) 2018 Émile Enguehard