The expression of exhaustivity and scalarity in Burmese

Keely New, Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine

Abstract


The Burmese particle hma expresses exhaustivity in some contexts but a scalar, even-like meaning in other contexts. We detail the distribution of hma and its meaning and develop a unified semantics. Hma is a not-at-issue scalar exhaustive, similar to the semantics proposed for English it-clefts in Velleman, Beaver, Destruel, Bumford, Onea & Coppock 2012. When hma takes wide scope, it leads to an exhaustive, cleft interpretation which is not scale-sensitive. When hma takes scope under negation, the resulting meaning will have a scale-sensitive felicity condition. We also discuss the semantics of the sentence-final mood marker dar, which we propose is a marker of propositional clefts (Sheil 2016), and its apparent role in the determination of the scope of hma.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Beaver, David Ian & Brady Clark. 2008. Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Wiley-Blackwell.

Bliss, Heather. 2010. Blackfoot -ikak: A case study of only and even. Handout from MOSAIC 2 at McGill University.

Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26. 511–545.

Büring, Daniel. 2011. Conditional exhaustivity presuppositions in clefts (and definites). Manuscript.

Büring, Daniel & Manuel Križ. 2013. It’s that, and that’s it! Exhaustivity and homogeneity presuppositions in clefts (and definites). Semantics & Pragmatics 6(6). 1–29.

Coppock, Elizabeth & David Ian Beaver. 2014. Principles of the exclusive muddle. Journal of Semantics 31. 371–432.

Crnič, Luka. 2011. Getting even: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka & Hadas Kotek. 2016. Even-NPIs in Dharamsala Tibetan. Linguistic Analysis 40(3–4). 129–165.

Greenberg, Yael. 2018. Mirror image scalar presuppositions for only and even. Manuscript.

Horn, Laurence Robert. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Robert I. Binnick, Alice Davison, Georgia M. Green & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Papers from the fifth regional meeting, 98–107. Chicago Linguistic Society.

Jenny, Mathias & San San Hnin Tun. 2016. Burmese: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge.

Karttunen, Lauri & Stanley Peters. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Choon-Kyu Oh & David A. Dinneen (eds.), Syntax and semantics, volume 11: Presupposition, 1–56. Academic Press.

Kato, Atsuhiko. 1998. Ekusupuresu Birumago [express burmese]. Tokyo: Hakusuisha.

Lahiri, Utpal. 1998. Focus and negative polarity in Hindi. Natural Language Semantics 6. 57–123.

Lee, Young-Suk & Laurence Horn. 1994. Any as indefinite plus even. Manuscript, Yale University.

Miashkur, Olena. 2017. Voobšče: A super-flexible scalar particle in Russian: Bar-Ilan University MA thesis.

Miashkur, Olena. to appear. A parametric comparison of two scalar particles in Russian. In Proceedings of IATL 33, .

Okell, John. 1969. A reference grammar of Colloquial Burmese. Oxford University Press.

Okell, John. 1994. Burmese: An introduction to the spoken language. Northern Illinois University, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.

Roberts, Craige. 1996/2012. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In Jae-Hak Yoon & Andreas Kathol (eds.), Papers in semantics, vol. 49 OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, Reprinted in Semantics & Pragmatics 5(6), 1–69, 2012.

Rojas-Esponda, Tania. 2014. A discourse model for überhaupt. Semantics & Pragmatics 7(1). 1–45.

Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116.

Sheil, Christine M. 2016. Scottish Gaelic clefts: Syntax, semantics, and pragmatics: University of California, Berkeley dissertation.

Velleman, Leah, David Ian Beaver, Emilie Destruel, Dylan Bumford, Edgar Onea & Liz Coppock. 2012. It-clefts are IT (inquiry terminating) constructions. In Proceedings of SALT 22, 441–460.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4442

Copyright (c) 2018 Keely New, Michael Yoshitaka Erlewine