The Thought Uniqueness Hypothesis

Uli Sauerland

Abstract


 A novel principle, the Thought Uniqueness Hypothesis (TUH), unifies several restrictions on interpretation that work in theoretical semantics has observed, in particular the following: binding and scope economy of Fox (2000, MIT Press), and constraints on types (Heim 2017, unpublished; Hirsch 2017, MIT Dissertation). The principle not only derives these phenomena, but makes additional novel pre- dictions such as a reduction of superiority and D-linking data and the interaction of i-within-i phenomena with coordination. Furthermore the principle exhibits close similarities to current work on exhaustification and efficiency (Meyer 2013, MIT Dissertation) with a potential for further unification. The statement of the TUH is most natural on a realizational view of grammar, where conceptual representations are generated by a non-linguistic system, and then realized by the linguistic sys- tem. It therefore argues against the view that surface word order plays a role in interpretation (Chomsky 1970, TEC Co., and others).


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexiadou, Artemis, Elena Anagnostopoulou & Florian Schäfer. 2015. External arguments in transitivity alternations: A layering approach. Oxford University Press.

Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Susi Wurmbrand. 2012. Word order and scope: Transparent interfaces and the 3/4 signature. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 371–421.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, Noam. 1972. Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.

Church, Alonzo. 1940. A formulation of the simple theory of types. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 5(2). 56–68.

Curry, Haskell B. 1930. Grundlagen der kombinatorischen Logik. American Journal of Mathematics 52. 509–536.

Dahl, Östen. 1973. On so-called ‘sloppy identity’. Synthese 26(1). 81–112.

Dayal, Veneeta. 1996. Locality in wh quantification. Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.

Elliott, Patrick D., Andreea C. Nicolae & Uli Sauerland. 2018. Who and what do who and what range over cross-linguistically? lingbuzz/003959.

Fleisher, Nicholas. 2013. Comparative quantifiers and negation: Implications for scope economy. Journal of Semantics 32(1). 139–171.

Fox, Danny. 1999. Reconstruction, variable binding and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30. 157–196.

Fox, Danny. 2000. Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Fox, Danny. 2012. The semantics of questions. Class notes for MIT seminars.

Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology. In Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, chap. 3, 111–176. MIT Press.

Heim, Irene. 2006. Little. Proceedings of SALT 16.

Heim, Irene. 2017. Type economy. Unpublished handout.

Hirsch, Aron. 2017. An inflexible semantics for cross-categorial operators. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Jacobson, Pauline. 1990. Raising as function composition. Linguistics and Philosophy 13. 423–475.

Jacobson, Pauline. 1999. Towards a variable-free semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 22. 117–184.

Johnson, Kyle. 2009. Gapping is not (VP-)ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40. 289–308.

Katzir, Roni. 2007. Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 30. 669–690.

Magri, Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures. constraint promotion for optimality theory. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

Marty, Paul P. 2017. Implicatures in the DP domain. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Mayr, Clemens & Benjamin Spector. 2010. Not too strong! generalizing the scope economy condition. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 14, 305–321.

Meyer, Marie-Christine. 2013. Ignorance and grammar. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

Meyer, Marie-Christine. 2015. Redundancy and embedded exhaustification. In S. D’Antonio, M. Moroney & C.R. Little (eds.), Semantics and Linguistic Theory

(SALT) XXV, 491–511. doi:10.3765/salt.v25i0.3486.

Nicolae, Andreea C. 2013. Any questions? polarity as a window into the structure of questions. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

Nissenbaum, Jon. 2000. Investigations of covert phrase movement. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.

Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: Movement and unselective binding. In Eric Reuland & A. ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Sauerland, Uli. 2001. Intermediate cumulation. Snippets 4.

Schönfinkel, Moses. 1924. Über die Bausteine der mathematischen Logik. Mathematische Annalen 92. 305–316.

Xiang, Yimei. 2016. Interpreting questions with non-exhaustive answers. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4414

Copyright (c) 2018 Uli Sauerland