More free choice and more inclusion: An experimental investigation of free choice in nonmonotonic environments

Nicole Gotzner, Jacopo Romoli, Paolo Santorio

Abstract


Disjunctions in the scope of possibility modals give rise to a conjunctive inference, generally labeled 'free choice'. A prominent approach derives free choice as a kind of scalar implicature. In this paper, we focus on the predictions of two main type of accounts within this approach, with the goal of investigating what implicature-generating algorithm best captures free choice and related data. The first is based on a standard algorithm for computing implicatures, which proceeds by negating (or 'excluding') alternatives to a sentence and adding the information so obtained to the assertion. The second proceeds by directly conjoining alternatives to the assertion (or 'including' them). This paper provides evidence that discriminates between the exclusion and the inclusion accounts. We focus on sentences involving possibility modals and disjunctions in the scope of nonmonotonic quantifiers: our key example is "Exactly one girl cannot take Spanish or Calculus". We report on an inferential task experiment testing this case. We find clear evidence that the sentence has a free-choice-type reading, on which it suggests that one girl cannot take either Spanish or Calculus and all of the others can choose between the two. This is challenging for exclusion accounts, but in line with the predictions of inclusion accounts. This case constitutes, therefore, an argument for inclusion accounts.


References


Aloni, Maria. 2016. Fc disjunction in state-based semantics. Unpublished Handout available here http://maloni.humanities.uva.nl/resources/nancy.pdf.

Alonso Ovalle, Luis. 2005. Disjunction in alternative semantics: UMASS dissertation.

Bar-Lev, Moshe & Danny Fox. 2017. Universal free choice and innocent inclusion. In Proceedings of SALT 27.

Bassi, Itai & Moshe Bar-Lev. 2016. A unified existential semantics for bare condi- tionals. In Proceedings of sinn und bedeutung 21.

Breheny, Richard, Nathan Klinedinst, Jacopo Romoli & Yasutada Sudo. 2017. The symmetry problem: current theories and prospects. Natural Language Semantics 1–26.

Chemla, Emmanuel. 2009. Universal implicatures and free choice effects: Experi- mental data. Semantics and Pragmatics 2(2).

Chemla, Emmanuel. 2010. Similarity: towards a unified account of scalar impli- catures, free choice permission and presupposition projection. Unpublished manuscript.

Chemla, Emmanuel & Benjamin Spector. 2011. Experimental evidence for embed- ded scalar implicatures. Journal of Semantics 28(3). 359–400.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2004. Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3, 39–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chierchia, Gennaro. 2013. Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford University Press.

Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector. 2012. The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning volume 3, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Fox, Danny. 2007. Free choice and the theory of scalar implicatures. In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics, 71–120. Palgrave.

Franke, Michael. 2011. Quantity implicatures, exhaustive interpretation, and rational conversation. Semantics and Pragmatics 4(1). 1–82. doi:10.3765/sp.4.1.

Goldstein, Simon. 2018. Free choice and homogeneity. Ms Lignan University.

Gotzner, Nicole & Jacopo Romoli. 2017. The scalar inferences of strong scalar terms under negative quantifiers and constraints on the theory of alternatives. Journal of Semantics 35(1). 95–126.

Kamp, Hans. 1974. Free choice permission. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74. 57–74.

Katzir, Roni. 2007. Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguistic and Philosophy 30(6). 669–690.

Klinedinst, Nathan. 2007. Plurality and possibility: UCLA dissertation.

Kratzer, Angelika & Junko Shimoyama. 2002. Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Yukio Otsu (ed.), Proceedings of the Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, vol. 3, 1–25. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.

Magri, Giorgio. 2009. A theory of individual-level predicates based on blind mandatory scalar implicatures: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.

Meyer, Marie-Christine. 2013. Ignorance and grammar: MIT dissertation.

Meyer, Marie-Christine. 2018. An apple or a pear: free choice disjunction. In H. Rullmann T.E. Zimmermann L. Matthewson, C. Meier (ed.), Wiley’s semantics companion, Wiley and Sons.

Santorio, Paolo. 2017. Alternatives and truthmakers in conditional semantics. Journal of Philosophy.

Santorio, Paolo & Jacopo Romoli. 2017. Probability and implicatures: A unified account of the scalar effects of disjunction under modals. Semantics & Pragmatics 10(13).

Simons, Mandy. 2005. Semantics and pragmatics in the interpretation of ‘or’. In Effi Georgala & Jonathan Howell (eds.), Proceedings of SALT XV, 205–222. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

Spector, Benjamin. 2007. Aspects of the pragmatics of plural morphology: On higher-order implicatures. In Uli Sauerland & Penka Stateva (eds.), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics, Palgrave.

Starr, Will. 2016. Expressing permission. In Proceedings of SALT 26, 325–349.

Willer, Malte. 2017. Widening free choice. In Proceedings from the amsterdam

colloquium 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/salt.v28i0.4430

Copyright (c) 2018 Nicole Gotzner, Jacopo Romoli, Paolo Santorio