A Subsegmental Correspondence Approach to Contour Tone (Dis)Harmony Patterns

Stephanie Shih, Sharon Inkelas

Abstract


Contour tones, like contour segments, exhibit dualist syntagmatic behavior: as whole units, they can participate in harmony (spreading) and disharmony (OCP-type restriction) processes or their internal, subsegmental components may act independently. Formally, such schizoid behavior from both contour tones and segments in (dis)harmony patterns has challenged previous phonological theory. As a solution, this paper presents a novel, quantized phonological representation for subsegmental units couched in existing surface correspondence theory (Agreement by Correspondence (ABC); Hansson 2001; Rose & Walker 2004; et seq.). The resulting approach, termed ABC+Q, treats tonally contoured segments as strings of tonally simplex subsegments and is thus capable of modeling both whole contour (segment-level) and partial contour (subsegment-level) effects as consequences of (dis)agreement triggered by phonological similarity and proximity. Such an approach makes it possible for the first time to offer a united treatment for the behavior of both contour tones and contour segments across observed patterns of (dis)harmony.


Keywords


contours, tone, harmony, dissimilation, Agreement by Correspondence, Q-theory

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akinbiyi, Akinlabi & Mark Liberman. 2001. Tonal complexes and tonal alignment. In Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 31, 1–20.

Applegate, Richard B. 1972. Inseño Chumash grammar. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.

Bao, Zhi-ming. 1990. On the Nature of Tone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

Bateman, Janet. 1990. Iau segmental and tonal phonology. Miscellaneous studies of Indonesian and other languages in Indonesia, vol. 10, 29–42.

Bennett, William G. 2013. Dissimilation, consonant harmony, and surface correspondence. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Ph.D. dissertation.

Browman, Catherine P. & Louis Goldstein. 1989. Articulatory Gestures as Phonological Units. Phonology 6(2). 201–251.

Chen, Matthew Y. 1985. Tianjin tone sandhi: erratic rule application. San Diego, CA: UC San Diego, Ms.

Chen, Matthew Y. 1992. Tone rule typology. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society: Special Session on the Typology of Tone Languages, 54–66. Berkeley, CA.

Chen, Tsung-Ying. 2011. Changzhi suffix tonal reduplication. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium. 17(1): 51–60. University of Pennsylvania. http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1167&context=pwpl.

Clements, G. N. 1985. The geometry of phonological features. Phonology Yearbook 2. 225–252.

Dindelegan, Gabriela P. (ed.). 2013. The grammar of Romanian. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Duanmu, San. 1994. Against Contour Tone Units. Linguistic Inquiry 25(4). 555–608.

Gafos, Adamantios I. 2002. A Grammar of Gestural Coordination. NLLT 20(2). 269–337.

George, Isaac. 1970. Nupe tonology. Studies in African Linguistics 1. 100–122.

Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

Golston, Chris & Wolfgang Kehrein. 1998. Mazatec Onsets and Nuclei. IJAL 64(4). 311–337.

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2001. Theoretical and Typological Issues in Consonant Harmony. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Ph.D. dissertation.

Hansson, Gunnar Ólafur. 2007. Blocking Effects in Agreement by Correspondence. Linguistic Inquiry 38(2). 395–409.

Hu, Wei. 2011. Production and perception of double contour tones in Qiyang Chinese. Paper presented at the IchPhS XVII, Hong Kong. http://www.icphs2011.hk/resources/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Hu/Hu.pdf.

Hualde, Jose. 1987. On Basque affricates. In Megan Crowhurst (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Assocation.

Hyman, Larry M. 2009. Tonal morphology: is it different? Paper presented at the Conference on Morphology of the World’s Languages, Leipzig, Germany. http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~exponet/mowl/Handouts/Hyman.pdf.

Hyman, Larry M. & Kenneth VanBik. 2002. Tone and syllable structure in Hakha-Lai. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, 15–28. Berkeley, CA.

Inkelas, Sharon. 2008. The dual theory of reduplication. Linguistics 46(2). 351–401.

Inkelas, Sharon & Stephanie S Shih. 2013a. Contour segments and tones in (sub)segmental Agreement by Correspondence. Paper presented at the 21st Manchester Phonology Meeting, University of Manchester, UK.

Inkelas, Sharon & Stephanie S Shih. 2013b. Unstable surface correspondence as the source of local conspiracies. Paper presented at NELS 2013, University of Connecticut.

Jamieson, Allan R. 1977. Chiquihuitlán Mazatec phonology. SIL International Publications in Linguistics 54. 93–105. Texas: SIL and the University of Texas at Arlington.

Leben, Will. 1978. The representation of tone. In Victoria Fromkin (ed.), Tone: A Linguistic Survey, 177–219. New York: Academic Press.

Leben, William R. 1973. Suprasegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

McCarthy, John J. 2010. Agreement by Correspondence without CORR constraints. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Ms. http://works.bepress.com/john_j_mccarthy/106.

McConvell, Patrick. 1988. Nasal cluster dissimilation and constraints on phonological variables in Gurindji and related languages. In Nicholas Evans and Steven Johnson (eds.), Aboriginal Linguistics 1, 135–165. Armidale: University of New England.

Morén, Bruce & Elizabeth Zsiga. 2006. The lexical and post-lexical phonology of Thai tones. NLLT 24. 113–178.

Pike, Kenneth & E. Pike. 1947. Immediate constituents of Mazatec syllables. IJAL 13. 78–91.

Remijsen, Bert. 2013. Tonal alignment is contrastive in falling contours in Dinka. Language 89(2). 297–327.

Rhodes, Russell. 2010. Vowel Harmony as Agreement by Correspondence. (UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report). UC Berkeley. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/phonlab/annual_report/annual_report_ 2012.html.

Rose, Sharon & Rachel Walker. 2004. A Typology of Consonant Agreement by Correspondence. Language 80(3). 475–531.

Sagey, Elizabeth C. 1986. The representation of features and relations in non-linear phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Ph.D. dissertation.

Sasa, Tomomasa. 2001. Ilokano geminates and compensatory lengthening: An OT account. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.

Shih, Stephanie S. 2013/submitted. Consonant-tone interaction as Agreement by Correspondence. Stanford University and UC Berkeley, Ms. http://stanford.edu/~stephsus/shih-ctoneABC-draftms_1-18-13.pdf.

Steriade, Donca. 1993. Closure, release, and nasal contours. In Marie K. Huffman & Rena Krakow (eds.), Nasals, nasalization, and the velum, 401–470. (Phonetics and Phonology 5). San Deigo, CA: Academic Press.

Steriade, Donca. 1994. Complex onsets as single segments. In Jennifer Cole & Charles Kisseberth (eds.), Perspectives in Phonology, 202–291. Stanford: CSLI.

Walker, Rachel. 2000a. Long-distance Consonantal Identity Effects. In Roger Billerey & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 19, 532–545. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

Walker, Rachel. 2000b. Yaka nasal harmony: Spreading or segmental correspondence? Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Aspect, 321–332.

Walker, Rachel. 2001. Round Licensing, Harmony, and Bisyllabic Triggers in Altaic. NLLT 19(4). 827–878.

Walker, Rachel. 2009. Similarity-sensitive blocking and transparency in Menominee. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, California. http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~rwalker/MenomineeLSAHdt.pdf.

Walker, Rachel. 2011. Vowel patterns in language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Wayment, Adam. 2009. Assimilation as attraction: Computing distance, similarity, and locality in phonology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Ph.D. dissertation.

Yip, Moira. 1989. Contour tones. Phonology 6(1). 149–174.

Yip, Moira. 2002. Tone. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Yu, Alan C. L. 2005. Toward a Typology of Compensatory Reduplication. Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 397–405. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Zhang, Jie. 2001. The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution: Typological survey and formal analysis. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Ph.D. dissertation.

Zuraw, Kie. 2002. Aggressive reduplication. Phonology 19(3). 395–439.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v1i1.22

Copyright (c) 2014 Stephanie Shih, Sharon Inkelas

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/