There is no Post-focal De-phrasing in English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3765/amp.v9i0.4930Keywords:
Post-focal deaccenting, Prominence, Phrasing, Pitch accent, Duration, EnglishAbstract
This paper studies the relationship between prosodic phrasing and prominence by addressing the questions of whether every prosodic phrase must have a head (a most prominent sub-constituent), and if so, how the head is marked. I study these questions by examining the intermediate phrase (iP) in English. If every iP must have a head, and this head must be marked by a pitch accent, then in an environment without any pitch accent, there should be no head/non-head distinction. And if there is no head, there should be no iP in this context either. I conducted a production study in English, and found durational evidence suggesting the presence of iP boundaries in an accent-less context. I also searched for durational evidence for iP-level prominence distinctions in this context, but here my results are mixed. One theoretical possibility that is compatible with my findings is that every phrase must have a head, but the head of an iP can be marked by something other than pitch accent, for example by phrasal stress.Downloads
Published
2021-05-01
Issue
Section
Supplemental Proceedings
License
Published by the LSA with permission of the author(s) under a CC BY 3.0 license.