Epistemic adverbs that can/cannot be embedded under imperatives

Yuto Hirayama, Shin Ihara

Abstract


This paper analyzes why certain epistemic adverbs are/are not embeddable under imperatives, by adopting Kaufmann’s (2012) modal analysis of imperatives and the assumption that epistemic modal bases are closed. The embeddable adverb is a modal modifier (Anand & Brasoveanu 2009) that expands the quantificational domain of the modal co-occurring with it, but the unembeddable one is a pure epistemic modal whose semantics does not involve an ordering source as in von Fintel & Gillies (2010). Imperative operators lose their contribution when they scope over the latter type adverbs because of vacuous quantification, hence violating a conversational principle proposed by Crniˇc (2011). The account lends support to the modal analysis of imperatives, which competes with Portner’s (2007) To-Do Lists analysis.

Keywords


imperatives; epistemic adverbs; deontic modals

Full Text:

PDF


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4521

Copyright (c) 2019 Yuto Hirayama, Shin Ihara

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Donate to the Open-Access Fund of the LSA

Linguistic Society of America


Advancing the Scientific Study of Language

ISSN (online): 2473-8689

This publication is made available for free to readers and with no charge to authors thanks in part to your continuing LSA membership and your donations to the open access fund.

The LSA is pleased to announce that Steve Anderson, former LSA President, has offered to match all donations made to the Society’s open access fund, up to $10,000, between now and the end of 2019. more ...