Upward agreement and syntactic counterfeeding in Lubukusu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5960Keywords:
complementizer agreement, directionality, syntactic counterfeeding, tier-based strictly local languages, Minimalist GrammarsAbstract
What are the constraints on agreement, and how does it interact with other syntactic operations? Recent studies suggest that syntactic dependencies are tier-based strictly local (TSL) over Minimalist Grammar derivation trees, a computationally restrictive model which closely fits many aspects of the formal typology (Graf 2022, Hanson 2025). Using this framework, I provide an analysis of upward complementizer agreement in Lubukusu (Diercks 2013), and show that it correctly predicts lack of agreement with hyperraised subjects without any additional assumptions. I argue further that the phenomenon should be understood as a kind of syntactic counterfeeding, which together with the existence of feeding, bleeding, and counterbleeding, suggests the need for a syntactic framework which can handle variable operation ordering.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kenneth Hanson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by the LSA with permission of the author(s) under a CC BY 4.0 license.