Upward agreement and syntactic counterfeeding in Lubukusu

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5960

Keywords:

complementizer agreement, directionality, syntactic counterfeeding, tier-based strictly local languages, Minimalist Grammars

Abstract

What are the constraints on agreement, and how does it interact with other syntactic operations? Recent studies suggest that syntactic dependencies are tier-based strictly local (TSL) over Minimalist Grammar derivation trees, a computationally restrictive model which closely fits many aspects of the formal typology (Graf 2022, Hanson 2025). Using this framework, I provide an analysis of upward complementizer agreement in Lubukusu (Diercks 2013), and show that it correctly predicts lack of agreement with hyperraised subjects without any additional assumptions. I argue further that the phenomenon should be understood as a kind of syntactic counterfeeding, which together with the existence of feeding, bleeding, and counterbleeding, suggests the need for a syntactic framework which can handle variable operation ordering.

Author Biography

  • Kenneth Hanson, Stony Brook University

    I am a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Linguistics at Stony Brook University.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18

How to Cite

Hanson, Kenneth. 2025. “Upward Agreement and Syntactic Counterfeeding in Lubukusu”. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 10 (1): 5960. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v10i1.5960.