Going beyond the Spatial Agency Bias: Agentivity, prominence and the visuospatial depiction of transitive sentences

Authors

  • Elsi Kaiser University of Southern California

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v11i1.6160

Keywords:

spatial agency bias, agentivity, clefts, spatial asymmetries, active vs. passive voice, thematic roles, word order, information structure, prominence

Abstract

When a person reads or hears a sentence, what kind of visuospatial representation do they construct? Prior work has proposed a Spatial Agency Bias, according to which people conceptualize events with a left-to-right trajectory, with  the left side associated with agency (at least in languages using left-to-right scripts). However, researchers disagree on the source and robustness of the Spatial Agency Bias. We suggest that a key obstacle stems from insufficient testing of how  agentivity relates to other concepts. We report two experiments manipulating voice, thematic role and word order. Our results point to a general Prominence Bias: 
Factors that make entities more prominent/salient favor left-side placement. 

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Kaiser, Elsi. 2026. “Going Beyond the Spatial Agency Bias: Agentivity, Prominence and the Visuospatial Depiction of Transitive Sentences”. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 11 (1): 6160. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v11i1.6160.